Ratwagon1600 Posted April 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 By by kim, by by kim........, its good by, by, by, by........ http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/us-and-russia-tensions-continue-in-the-wake-of-donald-trumps-missile-strike-on-syria/news-story/e08682113e57b87ac3110b33225cb31a 1 Link to comment
VFR800 Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 It doesn't have to make any sense, in fact there doesn't have to even be an end game, well, other than keeping it destabilized. That's the whole point of supplying arms to both sides. THIS They will keep killing each other no matter what, they've been doing it for 3000 years. THIS and. . . . so why not make $$$$$$$ from it. That is one of the main points as to why it continues,not the sole point but a main ones. Link to comment
tr8er Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Well the few Trump supporters I know have full blown jumped ship. Sucks that it took time in office (the dignity of the Country) to make that happen... He should have never stood as the GOP pick. Those who think Hillary would be worse are wrong for ONE reason. Senate and house were stacked. She would have gotten nothing through. Stale mate, while keeping it going another 4. I'm sick of that crap, but it's better than A. Trump, B. Hillaries policies. Now we will end up at war with Iran. And at their side will be China, Russia, and a few others. If we were seen as vulnerable, I'd hate to see who joined them... Link to comment
paradime Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Nothing can convince me Hillary would be any better. She's beholding all the way up the food chain and would have pulled much of the same politically driven military exhibitions. Trump was looking weak with N Korea firing missiles into the Sea of Japan at will, Syria Assad ostensively using chemical weapons on his own people... Now Trump shoots off a few missile with little real effect and suddenly he looks strong. It's political showmanship designed to make an impression. Read the spin coming from the administration and you see the impression they hope to make. What I find interesting is, when was the last time both parties were spinning military action is a good thing? We are being sold a story of justification. but will it be used to justify another large scale conflict in Iran? Stay tuned, but I have been hearing rumblings in the military community of Iran being the biggest threat to the world by far. 2 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Nothing can convince me Hillary would be any better. She's beholding all the way up the food chain and would have pulled much of the same politically driven military exhibitions. Trump was looking weak with N Korea firing missiles into the Sea of Japan at will, Syria Assad ostensively using chemical weapons on his own people... Now Trump shoots off a few missile with little real effect and suddenly he looks strong. It's political showmanship designed to make an impression. Read the spin coming from the administration and you see the impression they hope to make. What I find interesting is, when was the last time both parties were spinning military action is a good thing? We are being sold a story of justification. but will it be used to justify another large scale conflict in Iran? Stay tuned, but I have been hearing rumblings in the military community of Iran being the biggest threat to the world by far. I agree, let's see if the Dems can capitalize and put up a decent candidate.....I'm disappointed with the trumpet, hopefully he can win me back by getting his shit together, will see, still early, draining the swamp was my main deal. Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted April 9, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Some very high stakes posturing going on here! http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/us-and-russia-tensions-continue-in-the-wake-of-donald-trumps-missile-strike-on-syria/news-story/e08682113e57b87ac3110b33225cb31a Link to comment
125 CSL Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Well the few Trump supporters I know have full blown jumped ship. Sucks that it took time in office (the dignity of the Country) to make that happen... He should have never stood as the GOP pick. Those who think Hillary would be worse are wrong for ONE reason. Senate and house were stacked. She would have gotten nothing through. Stale mate, while keeping it going another 4. I'm sick of that crap, but it's better than A. Trump, B. Hillaries policies. Now we will end up at war with Iran. And at their side will be China, Russia, and a few others. If we were seen as vulnerable, I'd hate to see who joined them... The only saving grace is Hildabest would have been worse. Just in case you have already forgot,...Hildabeast was out hours before the bombing talking about she would be bombing the airports,..and she is part of the reason we are in the mess in the middle east now. The congress,...just incase you have also forgot, the gop is not lining up to do what Trump wants. 2 Link to comment
paradime Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Before parroting sides regarding Eric Prince's reported meetings in the Seychelles lets keep an open mind to that possibility and not jump to the conclusion that it has ANYTHING to do with Trump Russian collusion during the election. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-russia-secret-seychelles-meeting-blackwater-erik-prince-kremlin-official-uae-back-a7665371.html Blackwater made an absolutely SICK amount of dirty money in Iraq and Afghanistan, and although he avoids extradition for war crimes Prince continues to make sick money with Russia. As unseemly as it may be, it's no surprise Erik Prince is right in the middle of the effort to get Russia to back off it's support of Iran. China is also an ally of Iran, and during Trump's meating (misspell intended) with Xi Jinping it is no coincidence he bombed Syria right in the middle of it. So what message was being sent there? Was it about trade, defense missiles in S Korea, raining in Kym, or pulling support for Iran? They can tell us it was about sharing gardening ideas if they want. If an American president had plans to move against Iran for what ever reason, there is no way we can say it wouldn't be reasonable or unprecedented to establish back channel communication with all parties involved. That being said, any appearance of clandestine collaboration between these nations would spell instant political death for all three leaders. War is now the shadow government economy, just as Truman warned, and that model is what sustained the Roman empire for five Centuries. In this form of Government there is no right or left, there is only $ 2 Link to comment
125 CSL Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 I agree, let's see if the Dems can capitalize and put up a decent candidate.....I'm disappointed with the trumpet, hopefully he can win me back by getting his shit together, will see, still early, draining the swamp was my main deal. Unless the dems change course I do not think the next offering is going to be much better then the last. Just look at how far the base on the left is pushing the current leadership, add in who was picked for leader of the dnc,..... https://www.lp.org/ needs to get serious about putting up quality people in the midterms. Get a few voted in, then someone a hell of a lot better then the last one, might have a chance. 2 Link to comment
paradime Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 Dems are doomed to shoot themselves in the foot with who ever they prop up. Just like the right, they have let the extreme partisan define there message. The center is waiting, but I honestly think it will take a third party to fill that gap. 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 There are great ideals in the Objectivist party platform of vicious defense of individual rights freedoms and protection, and relying on scientific principles of objectivity to seek truth. But unlike Ayn Rand's les affair concept of "free market" principles, I believe there needs to be firm rules in place to even the playing field. If corporations are seen as individuals under the law, than as an individual I should have the same rights and access to the system as a corporation. Unfortunately Objectivists believe equality is the sole responsibility of the individual, but completely ignores objectively observable systemic power structures of wealth and bias that clearly effect equal access to the system. For objectivism to be valid, equality must be the core principle, as in All Individuals Are Created Equal. Or if you rather, a corporation should be held to the same laws I am. Just because you are wealthy, or enjoy bias favor in society, that shouldn't give you an advantage under the law, or in a truly free market place. Anyone who sees this as socialist either has no idea what objectivity means, or is mistaking a FREE market economy for a purely SAVAGE market economy. The rule of law is what holds a free society together, and that must also apply to transaction or trade between individuals. How can individual freedom exist without an even playing field? Nature doesn't bend the laws of physics to give the jaguar or the impala an unfair advantage. If a political party can resolve this inequity and present it to the nation, I truly believe now more then ever before, they would absolutely sweep up the vote left, right and center. 2 Link to comment
john510 Posted April 9, 2017 Report Share Posted April 9, 2017 I love how the conspiracy machine goes straight to work right after something happens. Every since 911 the conspiracy front has really taken off. Before it was just a few kooks running around with Grassy Knoll type shit and Big Foot. But now, thanks to mass and social media, everything has some sort of root and reality in their minds, ranging from publications to documentaries. If "In Search Of" was around today, everything they told us would be true. This again Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Seattle Mayor Ed Murray accused of sexually abusing troubled teen in 1980s http://www.syracuse.com/us-news/index.ssf/2017/04/seattle_mayor_ed_murray_accused_of_sexually_abusing_troubled_teen_in_1980s.html Link to comment
q-tip Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Seattle Mayor Ed Murray accused of sexually abusing troubled teen in 1980s http://www.syracuse.com/us-news/index.ssf/2017/04/seattle_mayor_ed_murray_accused_of_sexually_abusing_troubled_teen_in_1980s.html Guy has been abusing a whole city for years... 5 Link to comment
angliagt Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 This again I got to hating those "In Search Of" TV shows.They built up the hype, & never really came up with anything by the end of the show. 2 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Seattle Mayor Ed Murray accused of sexually abusing troubled teen in 1980s http://www.syracuse.com/us-news/index.ssf/2017/04/seattle_mayor_ed_murray_accused_of_sexually_abusing_troubled_teen_in_1980s.html 2 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Like.... why does a dropped tool always roll to the geographic center of the vehicle? How do matched socks mix themselves in the drawer? 2 Link to comment
DanielC Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 "why does a dropped tool always roll to the geographic center of the vehicle?" That is the law of selective gravation. It is a subset of Murphey's laws. 2 Link to comment
q-tip Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 "why does a dropped tool always roll to the geographic center of the vehicle?" That is the law of selective gravation. It is a subset of Murphey's laws. But do you know about Cole's law? 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 I agree, let's see if the Dems can capitalize and put up a decent candidate.....I'm disappointed with the trumpet, hopefully he can win me back by getting his shit together, will see, still early, draining the swamp was my main deal. A lot of what we've been hearing in the media has been discouraging.. Draining the swamp is important, but I think it's going to take time. Old tree's have deep roots. 2 Link to comment
Draker Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 This might shine some light on what your hearing regarding Syria. 4 Link to comment
240zness Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Murphy's If not trump and Israel..? Your only play is Palestine , iran , Noko? 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts