Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • datzenmike

    3465

  • john510

    1468

  • Mattndew76

    1041

  • paradime

    890

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You know there were several city blocks on fire in dc this year right? You know this isn’t the first time protesters invaded the capital? Or broke into offices in the capital. It happened within the last 4 years even. It was all done by the left. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Draker said:

You know there were several city blocks on fire in dc this year right? You know this isn’t the first time protesters invaded the capital? Or broke into offices in the capital. It happened within the last 4 years even. It was all done by the left. 

 

 

We’re legislators barricading themselves in rooms and hiding behind furniture?  Just curious.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, tr8er said:

Okay.  Trapped by armed gunmen.  Is that better?  Sound less scary?   
 

I didn’t lie, I just used the term liberally...

 

 Making a false statement while knowing it was untrue.

is a lie.

 

Otherwise you are making conversation without knowing anything in depth of what went on. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, datzenmike said:

trustmegfzn6.gif

 

Trust me? I trust you more than what the government tells me.

 


 

I just rewatched the running man earlier ,, check out the very start .. The writers missed the year by just over 3 years 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
1 minute ago, tr8er said:

armed protestors in DC
 

you can copy and paste that into Google images and let me know if you find a shortage.  


Normally if you make the claim you should back it up. But I did exactly what you said and found nothing. Zero.

 

because it’s a felony to carry a weapon in dc. Open or concealed without a permit. And you ain’t getting a permit in dc.

 

if you have a source I’m genuine interested.

Link to comment

Censorship is wrong for anyone. Full stop.

 

If you think speech you disagree with politically should be banned you are anti-1st amendment and therefore Anti-american. If you think the powers that be will just ban those you don't like well you will get exactly what you deserve.

 

 

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist

 

Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist

 

Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

 

Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew

 

Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

Edited by Dguy210
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Me too just for the fun of it.

 

 

I could be wrong but if a newspaper is biased in it's coverage and editorials, and if it doesn't want to print certain letters to the editor I think it can. You can't tell them what to print so your only recourse is to not buy their paper and get your news elsewhere. If a paper is wise it knows people will buy papers with good thought provoking editorials and coverage that is fair. Journalism began dying off around the time the internet got going. I'm sure they start off right and idealist, they just go off course. After 30 years or so I wonder what passes for 'journalism' in what ever schools teaches it? Thirty years of sucking on the same tit has blunted the public's taste for honest coverage of the news that's out there. It's like the lobster in a pot of cold water put on the stove. If it's gradual it never notices the bubbles.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
40 minutes ago, Draker said:


Normally if you make the claim you should back it up. But I did exactly what you said and found nothing. Zero.

 

because it’s a felony to carry a weapon in dc. Open or concealed without a permit. And you ain’t getting a permit in dc.

 

if you have a source I’m genuine interested.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/5-weapons-recovered-13-arrests-at-d-c-protests
 

Maybe was grenades or knives or fucking swords.  I am shocked at the images that popped up not being DC at all but other cities capitals from same day.  So yeah.  Here in Hawaii.  Not the best source.  
 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fox5dc.com/news/several-arrested-on-gun-charges-as-pro-trump-rallies-begin-in-dc.amp

 

guess there were guns.  So yeah.  

Edited by tr8er
  • Like 1
Link to comment
55 minutes ago, Dguy210 said:

137027021_796816520904843_3563535167026625243_n.jpg

MQQ5jK1E.jpeg

I don’t forget.  Nor would I ever post such a worst of one best of other BS meme and try to make a point with it.  Did anyone even Die in the weeks of protests in DC?   I know they did elsewhere.  But in DC, as the meme chooses to compare?  I don’t remember deaths there.  I do remember protests in the streets and Right wing groups literally arrested and taped for looting during the protests.  So far the Antifa claims are all blogger claims, but I do expect they will find some.  https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20200610/110775/HHRG-116-JU00-20200610-SD019.pdf

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, datzenmike said:

Me too just for the fun of it.

 

 

I could be wrong but if a newspaper is biased in it's coverage and editorials, and if it doesn't want to print certain letters to the editor I think it can. You can't tell them what to print so your only recourse is to not buy their paper and get your news elsewhere. If a paper is wise it knows people will buy papers with good thought provoking editorials and coverage that is fair. Journalism began dying off around the time the internet got going. I'm sure they start off right and idealist, they just go off course. After 30 years or so I wonder what passes for 'journalism' in what ever schools teaches it? Thirty years of sucking on the same tit has blunted the public's taste for honest coverage of the news that's out there. It's like the lobster in a pot of cold water put on the stove. If it's gradual it never notices the bubbles.  

 

The problem is that there was a paradigm shift. People are getting their news and "facts" from advertisement-fueled entertainment vectors, not from subscription-based journalists. News is a sideline affair - people are using social media for entertainment with some news on the side. They don't care if the news is accurate. They will continue to use the social media for the entertainment value even if you show them the news sideline is patently false. The dishonest news just becomes pervasive.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Mattndew76 said:

 

Absolute LIE

 

You really just posted something that NEVER happened. Why do you think the reporter was banned and more to be? There was press inside the whole event and not one weapon was brought in. The only guns in the building were from the Capitol Police and Secret Service. 

 

You are aware of the tunnel system under the national mall? 

 

Still looking to pin the blame.  You also see people as a 2D canvas. 

Please don’t start using dimensional chess lingo.  I really just diminishes any statement as not informed.  It literally just sounds like people who don’t know what they are talking about trying to sound smart.  Not usually how I read you.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 minute ago, thisismatt said:

 

The problem is that there was a paradigm shift. People are getting their news and "facts" from advertisement-fueled entertainment vectors, not from subscription-based journalists. News is a sideline affair - people are using social media for entertainment with some news on the side. They don't care if the news is accurate. They will continue to use the social media for the entertainment value even if you show them the news sideline is patently false. The dishonest news just becomes pervasive.

 

Not wrong.  People even take YouTube bloggers as news these days.  It’s all fuct.  

Link to comment

Have a look at the smug look on its face the whole way through, can't even keep a straight face through most of it. Just loving it, power! power! power! They are going to crush all the right, and the conservitives, then they are going for all the modern day brown coats, then when they run out of them, they will crush everyone else. In a hundred years time I wonder what they will have written our history like. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.