Mattndew76 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Again because so much crap was reported just so some outlet could be the 1st to a story the public is left with huge masses of BS to sift through. Will we know the truth without a spectacle of doubt? Always feels like a giant fucking con job on the people. All of this shit blunted 2 pieces of gun legislation that was supposed to be voted on this week. Hows that for a coincidence. 2 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Wouldn't this be something if it turns out it was Obama's fast and furious guns at play here.... 1 Link to comment
q-tip Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Weird how that was the second thing out of killarys mouth, organizing against the NRA and the bills they support. 2 Link to comment
tr8er Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Wouldn't this be something if it turns out it was Obama's fast and furious guns at play here.... You might as well decide what you want to believe on that one. If it was one of those guns, we will never hear about it. 2 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 almost a year of dems screeching has dulled many ears to them. when they ignore the political capital they could be making with their base off the shooter being a white male you know there's something they don't want discussed. Link to comment
tr8er Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 almost a year of dems screeching has dulled many ears to them. when they ignore the political capital they could be making with their base off the shooter being a white male you know there's something they don't want discussed. Um... No. The Majority of Democrats are white. As well, the vast majority of Hispanics and blacks are democrat. Thus, they would both alienate their majority and alienate the people on the right who are jumping ship already. Making a stupid racist move would be extremely far from the playbook. Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Um... No. The Majority of Democrats are white. As well, the vast majority of Hispanics and blacks are democrat. Thus, they would both alienate their majority and alienate the people on the right who are jumping ship already. Making a stupid racist move would be extremely far from the playbook. By God you're right! Fuckers musta forgot that this last election cycle!!! So by alienating 60% of their base it's really no mystery why Trump won! Hillary Clinton doesn’t need white men March 18, 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2016/03/18/hillary-clinton-doesnt-need-white-men/?utm_term=.7d57aeb58c66 wait.....if we just acknowledged that Hillary intentionally ignored 60% of her party's base then why are we going on a full year of investigating "muh Russian hackers!"? it's pretty conspiratorial to believe that anything will turn up after a year of finding nothing but, then again, it's also pretty conspiratorial to hear dems saying less than 24 hours after the largest mass shooting in the US that they did a thorough investigation of the shooter and have found him to be politically neutral and as pure as the driven snow except for the fact that he slaughtered 58 people. 1 Link to comment
q-tip Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Former Soviet sleeper cell, activated by the eclipse, trained by the kgb. Link to comment
racerx Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Former Soviet sleeper cell, activated by the eclipse, trained by the kgb....SALT. Link to comment
john510 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 Have they given info on the 500 injured? Struck by a bullet vs injured in the chaos. Receiving a bandage for scraps would get you on the list. Does it really matter how they were injured ? what was it that caused those injuries ? oh yeah a lunatic trying to shoot people.You can't blame people fleeing and injuring others because they feared for their lives. Link to comment
john510 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Share Posted October 3, 2017 If you didn't listen to Michael Savage's show yesterday, you did yourselves a disservice. There was no one who could link Paddock to any political, ideologist, or religious extremes which could lead to this, and since it required at least three days of planning, that chucks the whole, "he just snapped" theory right out the same fucking window the shots came from. There were reports of a Mexican woman going through the crowd telling everyone that they were going to die there about an hour before the event. Callers who were listening to the local police scanners reported that there were some other shooter events at a casino at the other end of the strip, possibly to draw SWAT and first responders from the concert area. Why did it take so long to get to the floor he was on, the broken windows and strobing from sustained AW fire should have narrowed the search parameters quite a bit. One has to ask, who could possibly benefit from an event like this. Who was the first one to chime in with an anti NRA tweet, why the same person who scuttles a US embassy to keep details of a dodgy arms deal from seeing daylight. Hey, the patsy plan worked pretty well for Allen Dulles, maybe they figured it was time to trot it out again, and since Paddock ostensibly killed himself before police arrived they didn't need a Jack Ruby this time. It would be interesting to know what was actually used. When the audio that everyone played starts out, you hear the familiar chatter of a Kalashnikov, and expect it to quit after 30, 40 max. When it continues, that makes you think drum or belt fed. The sustained fire rate seems like it's beyond the duty cycle of an AK barrel, but I guess if you have four or five of them lined up a total loss scenario is acceptable. Savage is as crazy as Hillary Clinton.Obviously the guy snapped.He snapped several days before he did this. Link to comment
racerx Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 Savage is as crazy as Hillary Clinton.Obviously the guy snapped.He snapped several days before he did this....more than likely snapped longer than several days. For someone to plan this out, plan this out, been going on for awhile. 1 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 The shooter used a bump stock.Is that something the 2nd amendment should cover also ? you know,so he can be protected from tyranny. It is currently legal and it is not a permanent modification to the firearm that would violate federal law. The piece itself is an accessory and not a firearm. And we all have the right to self defense, from foreign or domestic. If your people ban everything then it will be a tyrannical style government https://youtu.be/U7DTjSla-O8 1 Link to comment
thisismatt Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 The whole thing is f.i.s.h.y. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 It is currently legal and it is not a permanent modification to the firearm that would violate federal law. The piece itself is an accessory and not a firearm. And we all have the right to self defense, from foreign or domestic. If your people ban everything then it will be a tyrannical style government https://youtu.be/U7DTjSla-O8 My people ? i'm not some left wing lunatic. Link to comment
tr8er Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 My people ? i'm not some left wing lunatic. I think he meant US citizens Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 I think he meant US citizens No, I meant left wing lunatics 3 Link to comment
john510 Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 It is currently legal and it is not a permanent modification to the firearm that would violate federal law. The piece itself is an accessory and not a firearm. And we all have the right to self defense, from foreign or domestic. If your people ban everything then it will be a tyrannical style government https://youtu.be/U7DTjSla-O8 Let me spin this.With a toy like that the pro gun nuts have the audacity to complain about gun control ? B) Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 Let me spin this.With a toy like that the pro gun nuts have the audacity to complain about gun control ? B) Yes, cuz right to bare arms. Link to comment
240zness Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 Just saw a picture of 8 staples on forehead scalp from graze , the injuries must be rediculous Interesting the people that stay and move around calmly and help people cover deceased. I mean god bless Merica Does it really matter how they were injured ? what was it that caused those injuries ? oh yeah a lunatic trying to shoot people.You can't blame people fleeing and injuring others because they feared for their lives. 1 Link to comment
tr8er Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 I firmly stand behind our right to bare arms. But we can't allow citizens to stock up on warheads and skuds. There is a line that is drawn, and for good reason. It is unfortunate that people continue to push limits stirring this debate over and over ultimately increasing the cautionary lines breadth and scope. Shooting a fully automatic gun looks fun as hell. But they don't serve a practical purpose comensorate to the potential for infringing on others pursuit of life. Automatics are practically illegal and I think that is right. I also support background checks. There needs to be mental health disqualifiers in there as well IMO. But not every citizen should be given a gun, and not every citizen should be driving on the highways. It's just how it is in this rat cage. Keep guns for protection, hunting, sport. Continue to put stiff ass penalties on owning, or selling shit that is designed for the intent of maximum casualty. Mike, I do believe the amendment had our citizens vs government in mind when drafted. I've spend some time digging. 1 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 Let me spin this.With a toy like that the pro gun nuts have the audacity to complain about gun control ? B) They also shouldn't complain about massacres either. The 10 countries with the most gun-related deaths Honduras - 67.18 per 100,000 residents per year Venezuela - 59.13 Swaziland - 37.16 Guatemala - 34.1 Jamaica - 30.72 El Salvador - 26.77 Colombia - 25.94 Brazil - 21.2 Panama - 15.11 Uruguay - 11.52 The US is 10.54, just slightly better than these ten countries I wouldn't go to on a dare. Link to comment
240zness Posted October 4, 2017 Report Share Posted October 4, 2017 Cuz this merica chick is good.. Got to believe and PROTECT the right to bare arms 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts