Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I hear you John, and I know the timeline. Trump is president now and he did that while married. It's ridiculous to ignore what that means in the political arena. Obviously Trump did and that's why he tried to cover it up. Again would you and Draker extend the same forgiving latitude to Obama, or are you guys saying we should expect that Trump had no morals because he was a billionaire? 

 

Lets just say that being a billionaire makes having no morals way easier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

Unless Obama had done it. Step down off your horse of faux righteousness and get real.

Thanks for informing me how I would feel.

 

Obama was a public servant for many years before being elected president. If happened before that... it would be irrelevant. If it happened to anyone.. before being a public servant, I don't give one single fuck. That's because it has nothing to do with me. To any extent..

 

 

 

And I would hope it wouldn't bother you. That would be petty.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Unless Obama had done it. Step down off your horse of faux righteousness and get real.

 

Obama would have never done it because he has too much respect for Michelle...besides she would have whoop'd his ass and he knows it. 

 

Trump could give 2 shits about Melania, more of a throw her in the gutter and go buy another relationship lol.

Link to comment

Do you guys remember when Bill Clinton was being skinned alive by the right, and Larry Flint put out a $25K bounty on any politician who had an extra marital affair?

 

26061595338_3b2c9a97a4_b.jpg

...oh yeh, this guy..newt the holier than thou guy, yeh that guy.
Link to comment

Thanks for informing me how I would feel.

 

Obama was a public servant for many years before being elected president. If happened before that... it would be irrelevant. If it happened to anyone.. before being a public servant, I don't give one single fuck. That's because it has nothing to do with me. To any extent..

 

 

 

And I would hope it wouldn't bother you. That would be petty.

 

We can all say with honesty that we don't give a shit about the sex lives of elected officials, but we all know that's not how politics works. 

 

Obama's image as a dedicated family man would have been destroyed if something like this came out during his presidency, even if it happened in the past. Republicans would have torn him a new asshole and we all know it.

 

I can't help but point out how astonishingly quick there has been a complete moral flip flop between the right and left manufactured realities. All of a sudden the left has become the party of zero tolerance for sexual impropriety. While now even evangelicals are bending their rigid family value rules when it comes to Trump's sexual behavior. Why is this happening? Because both sides have overplayed their hand damning the other. For years, traditional values conservatives have been judging the amoral left with their free speech, drugs, violent pornographic music and movies. The left responded with political correctness as their morality. The rights response was to become rampant anti PC swaying into Trump style amorality in the process. 

 

Hypocrisy doesn't even begin to cover this ridiculousness.  

Link to comment

Robert Mueller, heading the Russia collusion investigation... literally hand delivered USA uranium to Russia as part of the Uranium One deal. 

 

Anyone questioning why he wants Trump gone?

 

 

 

2hac.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Unless Obama had done it. Step down off your horse of faux righteousness and get real.

Obama is gay I thought

 

CNN is definitely fucking people in both ears

 

More and more we depend on professionals or experts. It should make real sense to you if you believe it

Link to comment

Fake news.

 

Actually kind of correct, this was not from Uranium one.. that was an error on my part.

 

But yes, was hand delivering Highly Enriched Uranium... to Russia. 

 

 

Originally published by Wikileaks in 2011.. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Robert Mueller, heading the Russia collusion investigation... literally hand delivered USA uranium to Russia as part of the Uranium One deal. 

 

Anyone questioning why he "wants Trump gone"?

 

It's easy to point out the bias of CNN as being manufactured reality. No one is disputing that, but until you're honest about your own side, there's no point in taking your posts seriously.

 

I took a stab at answering your question here.

 

The first paragraph of the whole document reads:

 

"Background: Over two years ago Russia requested a

ten-gram sample of highly enriched uranium (HEU) seized in

early 2006 in Georgia during a nuclear smuggling sting

operation involving one Russian national and several Georgian

accomplices.  The seized HEU was transferred to U.S. custody

and is being held at a secure DOE facility.  In response to

the Russian request, the Georgian Government authorized the

United States to share a sample of the material with the

Russians for forensic analysis.  Director Mueller previously

planned to deliver the sample in April (Ref A), but due to a

scheduling conflict the trip was canceled."

 

https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a.html

 

From this you get made up crimes that don't exist

 

 

 

Is this how you got the idea this Uranium sample hand off effects Robert Mueller's ability to head the Russia investigation, or how this equates to a motive to want Trump gone? If it was a conspiracy to sell US uranium *directly* to Russia the only evidence is Russia bought 20% stock in a US company making low grade cake Uranium. 

 

If you repost a truncated clip pulled out of context like this because it looks incriminating, isn't making up crimes that don't actually exist textbook fake news? Unlike Judicial Watch and National Review, real news makes an effort to look into it's source aka the whole document made public by Wickyleaks. This implication of a mysterious uranium meeting stems from a nuclear smuggling sting operation conducted during G.W. Bush's administration. Other than a cheep attempt to slander Mueller's integrity, WTF does it have to do with the investigation into Russia's efforts to throw the 2016 election? 

 

Here's a better question. Anyone questioning why Trump want's Mueller gone? 

 

Although none of the evidence, witness accounts, and confessions Mueller collected have been made public, here's what manufacturing reality looks like on both sides.

 

 

 

again, making up crimes that don't exist

https://youtu.be/66anWCzAEXw?t=4m23s

 

Both sides are so hell bent on taking down the other, they've sacrificed their own integrity to do it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

A leak of a us government cable.. yup propaganda if I've seen it. Why is the director of the fbi hand delivering uranium to russia? That's not.. strange?

 

Fine.. disregard it.

 

Many other conflicts of interest.. let's just watch where this goes.

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.