Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Patriot Act was predicated on a pack of very fucked up lies.

 

First the idea that it was a failure of the CIA and FBI not communicating with one another is why 9/11 happened. That's pure BS. There were strict rules in place to intentionally divide these two entities and for good reason. It was to keep what is happening now from ever happening. FBI is for internal investigation and federal law enforcement, CIA is foreign intel and espionage. 60% of the CIA's work load is covert influence of foreign elections. The NSA dwarfs the FBI and CIA combined and they are spying on us folks right now and feeding the machine.

 

This clear divide was intended to keep the public safe form these entities ever blending covert intel, and federal law enforcement on the AMERICAN PEOPLE. With the Patriot Act, it became perfectly legal for the executive branch's National Security Adviser to unmask Americans communicating with foreigners who are being spied on. I don't know if Trump did anything wrong yet, but you can thank Bush for opening that door, and Obama for keeping it open. We gave our government permission to do this shit, so quit griping and start changing it. These cock suckers are supposed to be working for us.

 

I'm with you 100%, Jeb was next in line for the replublitard establishment, hence the hatred on Trump by the heads of the party, a lot of people don't see this, but it is an internal war going on within the party, they are really afraid of the Donald and will do anything to get rid of him, the whole repeal and replace of Obamacare was by design, the trumpet wanted to test the waters and see where the establishment stands, clearly he hit various nerves, this is only the beginning.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • KoHeartsGPA

    2561

  • datzenmike

    2330

  • Draker

    2054

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    2012

Top Posters In This Topic

...Russia needs to take Asad out

 

Only if they have a plan on who will take over. I'm guessing with their history then would love to take over.. lol

 

USA would not be having this though.

 

 

I personally don't believe Assad had anything to do with the gas attack. I don't have a security clearance though.. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Here are some points to make you think. Source: Reddit

 

  1. Syria, with Russia's help, is winning against ISIS. Why would Assad use chemical weapons when he has nothing to gain and everything to lose?

  2. This comes on the heels of the Dirty Rice Scandal

  3. This comes the day before an international conference about the situation in Syria.

  4. The USA, Syria, and Russia all concluded that the chemical weapons had been destroyed.

  5. Sarin is fucking nasty, and it sticks around for a while. The White Hats showed up without any protection immediately after the chemical weapons had been deployed. They should be dead, along with the victims.

  6. We know the "Moderate Rebels" have no compunctions about using chemical weapons themselves so long as they have a supplier. We also know that the US has funded these rebels through the CIA with resources, money, and weapons.

  7. An anti-Assad reporter tweeted about a media campaign covering the use of chemical weapons by Assad a full day before it happened.

  8. Doctor who the media interviewed had time for video conference calls with reporters while patients were "flooding in"

  9. Same doctor had received anti-Sarin gear a week prior and gas masks 2-3 days prior to the attack, despite all of Syria's Sarin deposits being destroyed by the Syrian government back in 2013

  10. John McCain was immediately ready to say that Assad was behind these gas attacks, just like he did in 2013 (when it was later shown that it was actually the rebels who made a gas attack)

  11. John McCain visited Syria one month ago, just like he had visited Syria one month before the 2013 gas attacks

 

I've posted pictures from McCains 2013 meeting.. with the leaders of ISIS.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Here are some points to make you think. Source: Reddit

 

 

  • Syria, with Russia's help, is winning against ISIS. Why would Assad use chemical weapons when he has nothing to gain and everything to lose?
  • This comes on the heels of the Dirty Rice Scandal
  • This comes the day before an international conference about the situation in Syria.
  • The USA, Syria, and Russia all concluded that the chemical weapons had been destroyed.
  • Sarin is fucking nasty, and it sticks around for a while. The White Hats showed up without any protection immediately after the chemical weapons had been deployed. They should be dead, along with the victims.
  • We know the "Moderate Rebels" have no compunctions about using chemical weapons themselves so long as they have a supplier. We also know that the US has funded these rebels through the CIA with resources, money, and weapons.
  • An anti-Assad reporter tweeted about a media campaign covering the use of chemical weapons by Assad a full day before it happened.
  • Doctor who the media interviewed had time for video conference calls with reporters while patients were "flooding in"
  • Same doctor had received anti-Sarin gear a week prior and gas masks 2-3 days prior to the attack, despite all of Syria's Sarin deposits being destroyed by the Syrian government back in 2013
  • John McCain was immediately ready to say that Assad was behind these gas attacks, just like he did in 2013 (when it was later shown that it was actually the rebels who made a gas attack)
  • John McCain visited Syria one month ago, just like he had visited Syria one month before the 2013 gas attacks
I've posted pictures from McCains 2013 meeting.. with the leaders of ISIS.

12. John McCain is dirty as fuck.

  • Like 4
Link to comment

Russia needs oil , but at 50?.. need to lock that in, see where electric cars end up

 

Tesla worth more than Ford and GM ? I see the momentum and new cars are a tough market?

 

Russia has an ass load of oil. What's killing Russia is the low price of oil since 2014

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnmauldin/2016/12/27/low-oil-prices-will-make-russia-more-aggressive-in-2017/#66dad1cb7367

 

Why is Russia in Syria? Close ties with Syria gives Russia open military access to the Mediterranean Sea and Assad has given them what they want. Right now Turkey and Greece stand between Russia and Europe's main body of water. In October 2016, Russian parliament ratified an open agreement for the base that revealed a pact to give Russia unfettered ability to move personnel and cargo in and out without inspection or interruption by Syria. After that more troops and massive firepower, including advanced missile systems have been moved in.

 

Now why the fuck should we be friendly with Russia?

 

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/12/12/1609948/-Why-does-Russia-want-Trump-It-s-all-about-oil-Why-does-Trump-want-Russia-It-s-all-about-money

 

"Progressive" blog, but interesting path to follow the money

 

Disclaimer: Daily Kos is an outlet for Political Blogging. It functions as a discussion forum and group blog for a variety of netroots activists whose efforts are primarily directed toward influencing and strengthening progressive policies and candidates (Wikipedia). Daily Kos has many different writers and therefore it is unpredictable in bias and factual reliability.  It is up to the reader to fact check these writers and to look for good sourcing in each article.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Here are some points to make you think. Source: Reddit

 

  1. Syria, with Russia's help, is winning against ISIS. Why would Assad use chemical weapons when he has nothing to gain and everything to lose?

  2. This comes on the heels of the Dirty Rice Scandal

  3. This comes the day before an international conference about the situation in Syria.

  4. The USA, Syria, and Russia all concluded that the chemical weapons had been destroyed.

  5. Sarin is fucking nasty, and it sticks around for a while. The White Hats showed up without any protection immediately after the chemical weapons had been deployed. They should be dead, along with the victims.

  6. We know the "Moderate Rebels" have no compunctions about using chemical weapons themselves so long as they have a supplier. We also know that the US has funded these rebels through the CIA with resources, money, and weapons.

  7. An anti-Assad reporter tweeted about a media campaign covering the use of chemical weapons by Assad a full day before it happened.

  8. Doctor who the media interviewed had time for video conference calls with reporters while patients were "flooding in"

  9. Same doctor had received anti-Sarin gear a week prior and gas masks 2-3 days prior to the attack, despite all of Syria's Sarin deposits being destroyed by the Syrian government back in 2013

  10. John McCain was immediately ready to say that Assad was behind these gas attacks, just like he did in 2013 (when it was later shown that it was actually the rebels who made a gas attack)

  11. John McCain visited Syria one month ago, just like he had visited Syria one month before the 2013 gas attacks

 

I've posted pictures from McCains 2013 meeting.. with the leaders of ISIS.

Not a shock at all these day. I would be willing to bet a US connection. 0bama had an unnatural desire to remove Assad With Syria really removed from the news for some time now, needed a big event to bring it back to the front page.

This US caused war in Syria is a crisis almost around the world.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Russia needs oil , but at 50?.. need to lock that in, see where electric cars end up

 

 

 

Russia doesn't have to need oil. It only has to disrupt oil supplies to the US, Japan and elsewhere.

Link to comment

Russia refines 11 million barrels of oil a day. In 08, oil was $145 per barrel, and as of 2014 Russia was exporting over 60% of it's oil. That's what brought it out of financial ruin. Now that oil is under $50 Russia is hurting once again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Also reports are the gas used was Sarin gas.. but if you look at the first responders, they aren't wearing any PPE. Sarin is absorbed through the skin? 

 

C8rpBatVYAAN_-G.jpg

 

 

 

Makes me think about the fake picture of the child sitting in the back of the ambulance in Aleppo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Also reports are the gas used was Sarin gas.. but if you look at the first responders, they aren't wearing any PPE. Sarin is absorbed through the skin? 

 

C8rpBatVYAAN_-G.jpg

 

 

 

Makes me think about the fake picture of the child sitting in the back of the ambulance in Aleppo.

 

Yeah....This shit doesn't add up....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.