Jump to content

Airplane Porn (and the occasional helicopter)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 weeks later...

An Osprey, pretty close to the house, and pretty close to the ground. About 1000 feet Above Ground Level.

Crappy pic but had to grab my phone and run out of the shop after I heard it.

DV5nEMb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
4 hours ago, flyerdan said:

A while back I saw a flight of Ospreys go over (4 or 5).  They were pretty high, but they have a distinctive sound.  I don't recall ever having seen one before.

 

               They do have an unusual sound.I heard loud noises,& then saw 

TWO of them flying by.I think they were on their way to Norfolk.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, angliagt said:

 

               They do have an unusual sound.I heard loud noises,& then saw 

TWO of them flying by.I think they were on their way to Norfolk.

They sound like a heavy helicopter, which we also get flying by at fairly low altitude.  Had 3 helicopters fly directly over the house a couple of days ago at a fairly low altitude.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Another Opsrey note; the other night I heard the "heavy helicopter" sound again. I rolled outside and it was passing over the house and I didn't have my phone.

The tips of the rotors were illuminated in green.

 

Went to the National Museum of Nuclear Science and History over the weekend with Missus Kelmo.

qubNrpw.jpg

 

Pretty sure we'll be going back.

Like when the weather is a little warmer.

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Having worked for Pratt & Whitney doing structural and modal analysis of compressor and turbine blades, it gives me the heebeegeebees when ancient jet engines are operated where there is no documentation.  Rotor speed operating ranges are critical to avoid blade resonances which are catastrophic if not.  (One might think it would be safer to run the engine at lower speeds but that couldn't be farther from the truth.)  Then there are the inspection intervals and what to look for looking for.   

  • Like 4
Link to comment

All engineering advances are not from rigorous calculations from books of tables and formulas. It's basically trial and error. If it crashes you figure out what it was and fix it. If it works, you use that information on the next plane. There isn't a building, plane, train, car or boat today that doesn't have a history of disaster in it's past that didn't lead to a better understanding of engineering principals.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

20 years ago when I worked at P&W, blade attachments were evolved epically.  At the time FEM analysis tools like NASTRAN and ANSYS were incapable of modeling firtrees.  And even if bearing stresses were known, there was no existing criteria.  I assume they are now able to model them appropriately with contact elements and are correlating bearing stresses with know wear patterns that have been documented for older designs.  

 

Boundary conditions have always been a challenge as well as plasticity in stress concentrations.  Goodman Diagrams back then did not account for plasticity.  A guy name Juvinal had worked out a simple way to do that and we were just starting to consider such methods to eliminate unnecessary conservatism.

 

Just writing these few sentences has aggravated my head injury from my June 2021 head breaking windshield totally of my 87 Turbo Sprint, the most fun car I ever owned.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
On 3/4/2023 at 6:30 PM, datzenmike said:

All engineering advances are not from rigorous calculations from books of tables and formulas. It's basically trial and error. If it crashes you figure out what it was and fix it. If it works, you use that information on the next plane. There isn't a building, plane, train, car or boat today that doesn't have a history of disaster in it's past that didn't lead to a better understanding of engineering principals.

 

 

 

Physists calculate,Enginers make it work!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
On 3/5/2023 at 12:05 AM, Cardinal Grammeter said:

20 years ago when I worked at P&W, blade attachments were evolved epically.  At the time FEM analysis tools like NASTRAN and ANSYS were incapable of modeling firtrees.  And even if bearing stresses were known, there was no existing criteria.  I assume they are now able to model them appropriately with contact elements and are correlating bearing stresses with know wear patterns that have been documented for older designs.  

 

Boundary conditions have always been a challenge as well as plasticity in stress concentrations.  Goodman Diagrams back then did not account for plasticity.  A guy name Juvinal had worked out a simple way to do that and we were just starting to consider such methods to eliminate unnecessary conservatism.

 

Just writing these few sentences has aggravated my head injury from my June 2021 head breaking windshield totally of my 87 Turbo Sprint, the most fun car I ever owned.

 

United Airlines Flight 232

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.