john510 Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 The difference between GL4 and GL5 gear oil is the anti scuff additives. GL4 is 4% and GL5 is 6% but this is not a 2% difference. To go from 4 to 6 you need 2 more, or half again as much as 4 or 50% more. That's a huge difference. Wrong forum Mike,can we get a mod to move this to the Drivetrain forum ? B) 1 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 Taken out of context you can make this looks like a compelling accusation, but you left out the next sentence. Senate Bill 1322, authored by Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), make the crimes of solicitation and loitering with intent to commit prostitution misdemeanors inapplicable to children younger than 18. It also allows law enforcement to take sexually exploited children into temporary custody -- only if leaving them unattended would pose an immediate threat to their health or safety. Legislation to curb human trafficking was a prominent issue at the state Capitol this session, as prosecutors and advocates in recent years have pushed the issue to the political forefront. Most of the proposals have focused on the trade of forced sex and reflect a cultural shift in the approach to prostitution that aims to divert victims forced into the industry away from the criminal justice system. Most of Cus is taken out of context.... Wrong forum Mike,can we get a mod to move this to the Drivetrain forum ? B) I was trying to couch the answer in terms that... a/ would actually contain some useful gear oil information. b/ would be (perhaps) appealing to gear heads and an applied use of math in an automotive application. I wish my teachers had explained math use in compression calculations. It would have been more interesting. 1 Link to comment
240zness Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 the difference between 35 and 21 is 40% 100 divided by 35 = 2.85 35 - 21 = 14 14 x 2.85 = 39.9% Or 14% less of your money Link to comment
paradime Posted December 23, 2017 Report Share Posted December 23, 2017 Or 14% less of your money 3 Link to comment
DanielC Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Until 2015, net neutrality did not exist. If I remember correctly, we have progressed from speeds of 300 Kbs on a dial up modem, connected by placing the handset on a box with cup for the earpiece, and microphone end to speeds that were almost impossible without a dedicated T1 connection, on cable or a twisted pair phone lines. Remember when cell phones were bricks, and cost over 75 cents a minute? Net neutrality will stifle competition, and improvement. Think how good of a job government is at keeping health care costs down. 5 Link to comment
Rjawm Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Photobucket was just ahead of their time lol 3 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Taken out of context you can make this article look like a compelling accusation, but you left out the next sentence. Senate Bill 1322, authored by Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles), make the crimes of solicitation and loitering with intent to commit prostitution misdemeanors inapplicable to children younger than 18. It also allows law enforcement to take sexually exploited children into temporary custody -- only if leaving them unattended would pose an immediate threat to their health or safety. Legislation to curb human trafficking was a prominent issue at the state Capitol this session, as prosecutors and advocates in recent years have pushed the issue to the political forefront. Most of the proposals have focused on the trade of forced sex and reflect a cultural shift in the approach to prostitution that aims to divert victims forced into the industry away from the criminal justice system. Now, are you going to correct me on any of the six Okie kiddie diddler teachers? Truth is, shit's weird everywhere. Can't believe they missed this one. Oklahoma court: oral sex is not rape if victim is unconscious from drinking https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/27/oral-sex-rape-ruling-tulsa-oklahoma-alcohol-consent Oklahoma,here we come! 2 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Photobucket was just ahead of their time lol $300 a year to host old pictures I'd forgotten about. photobucket indeed lost the plot. they and Direct TV need to rethink their life decisions. 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 $300 a year to host old pictures I'd forgotten about? End of Net Neutrality, here we come! This is you trying to get on that proverbial Information Super Highway https://qz.com/1158328/what-will-happen-now-that-net-neutrality-is-gone-we-asked-the-experts/ Link to comment
tr8er Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 From the article above... This is the biggest fuckup yet. A straight up mockery and dissent from freedom of our society. We will, I expect, have a very hard time reversing this if it sticks for more than a couple of years. And next election, all information CAN be filtered by your ISP. Thus, can be bought. Fuck all you people thinking this is good because Trump and the cronie FCC pushed it. This is an affront to the people. An affront to freedom of information. And ultimately a leap toward totalitarianism we see in China/ Russia. "Telecoms have already given signs they will do this. In a 2013 court case over net neutrality, Verizon told a federal judge that it had the right to prevent users from accessing any website or online service if content providers did not pay fees to the telecom. This payment, no matter the amount, does not count as blocking since it was an “information service.” The court agreed with Verizon, and noted that the FCC had to regulate telecoms as a common carrier under Title II if it wished to assert this power (you can hear the full hearing here). This eventually helped prompt the 2015 FCC decision to classify telecoms as common carriers." Link to comment
paradime Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Until 2015, net neutrality did not exist. If I remember correctly, we have progressed from speeds of 300 Kbs on a dial up modem, connected by placing the handset on a box with cup for the earpiece, and microphone end to speeds that were almost impossible without a dedicated T1 connection, on cable or a twisted pair phone lines. Remember when cell phones were bricks, and cost over 75 cents a minute? Net neutrality will stifle competition, and improvement. Think how good of a job government is at keeping health care costs down. Until 2015, net neutrality did not exist? Oh really, Look at all the well informed Fox News folks lining up to "like" this BS. Little do they know they are cheering the loss of their freedoms and protections on the internet that Republicans put in place 12 years ago. Under George W Bush, August 5, 2005 FCC Adopts a Policy Statement Regarding Network Neutrality http://www.techlawjournal.com/topstories/2005/20050805.asp The FCC is unilaterally giving up its net neutrality authority with little to replace it https://qz.com/1134686/the-fcc-plans-to-unilaterally-give-up-its-net-neutrality-authority-with-little-to-replace-it/ What will happen now that net neutrality is gone? We asked the experts https://qz.com/1158328/what-will-happen-now-that-net-neutrality-is-gone-we-asked-the-experts/ The vote effectively negated the FCC’s authority and three core net neutrality principles formally adopted under President George W. Bush: the freedom to access any lawful internet content and the freedom to use any online service or application (as well as undermining expectations of a robust, competitive market for network providers). It also does away with FCC's antitrust authority. In its place, the FCC will let telecoms commit to voluntary principles, which must be disclosed to subscribers, and then leave enforcement up to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The new rules will go into effect in the coming weeks. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Fuck all you people thinking this is good because Trump and the cronie FCC pushed it. This is an affront to the people. An affront to freedom of information. And ultimately a leap toward totalitarianism we see in China/ Russia. "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others" remember that Churchill? quote? Well who says net neutrality is perfect here? It's just worse elsewhere. Link to comment
Draker Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Google, facebook, youtube, twitter, reddit and others already censor content. Don't get your nuts in a twist. If you have isp's actively lobbying for net neutrality and then you have to wonder why they are pushing so hard for it. Have you ever once trusted comcast, verison, att... for anything at all? Have you ever heard anything good about these companies? Why for one minute would you trust them to be on the right side of net neutrality if there wasn't something substantially in their favor? They already prioritize traffic, they already sell your data, they already spy on you, they censor content.... 2 Link to comment
Draker Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 None of that shit makes it right... but those regulations didn't stop them from doing it already. If they all support net neutrality, why would they start doing all the shit they supposedly oppose because the regulations were reversed? Link to comment
john510 Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Merry Christmas guys 3 Link to comment
paradime Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Google, facebook, youtube, twitter, reddit and others already censor content. Don't get your nuts in a twist. If you have isp's actively lobbying for net neutrality and then you have to wonder why they are pushing so hard for it. Have you ever once trusted comcast, verison, att... for anything at all? Have you ever heard anything good about these companies? Why for one minute would you trust them to be on the right side of net neutrality if there wasn't something substantially in their favor? They already prioritize traffic, they already sell your data, they already spy on you, they censor content.... If you have isp's actively lobbying for net neutrality? Draker, I honestly don't get it, Democrats are dirty as coyote shit on this one. Unfortunately you have no idea what forces are at play behind this. You actually think isp's lobbied for net neutrality? Please show me where you got that. How Lobbyists Killed Net Neutrality https://represent.us/action/how-lobbyists-killed-net-neutrality/ Link to comment
paradime Posted December 24, 2017 Report Share Posted December 24, 2017 Happy holidays Christmas Link to comment
datzenmike Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 It's 8 hrs of a small loop played over and over. We used to have one on the community cable channel where they put fresh logs on. Link to comment
paradime Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 Yeah, what ever. Merry F'n Christmas you old Canuck. :hug: 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 Whatever holidays you all celebrate I hope they are great. Link to comment
tr8er Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 Hope you all get laid tonight rats. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted December 25, 2017 Report Share Posted December 25, 2017 Yeah, what ever. Merry F'n Christmas you old Canuck. :hug: That was your Xmas present. Best wishes to you and yours. Hope you all get laid tonight rats. .Thank for the good wishes but.. in the morning, I need my sleep and there's nothing harder than morning wood. I mean it Gary! . Link to comment
Recommended Posts