Rhapakatui Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Can we arrange a death match between the black block and the White Knights of the KKK? Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 We must unite and declare war on the establishment! 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 We must unite and declare war on the establishment! Nothing would please me better except maybe a hippie hand job right about now. 3 Link to comment
Rhapakatui Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 We must unite and declare war on the establishment! 1 Link to comment
flatcat19 Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I'm telling you, even honorable and intelligent life long conservatives like my father are concerned with Trumps erratic behavior on the world stage. I think it's kind of fucked up that I need to assure Mike that I'm not trolling here, but I do want to make a point, so here you go. My name is Paradime and I stand behind this opinion 100%. I don't need fake or real news to see Trump's behavior is consistent with a narcissistic personality type. In fact I posted this observation and the DSM V criteria under the same context almost a year ago right here in Cuz (page 133). I was responding to dhp123166 http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358654My response http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358662 Saying this is fake news, or comes from some left wing agenda is directly parroting Trump's deflection tactics. The idea that people questioning Trump are "swamp tenders that want to be losers" reflects a demand for absolute obedience to Trump's rhetoric. I want to challenge that defensive thinking, and ask that folks keep an open mind before brushing me off as an educationally brainwashed libtard who's trying to troll everyone because I speak out against Trump. I didn't vote for president this election, because I know dangerous shit (on both sides) when I see it. I'm all about overthrowing the corrupt Washington establishment, but I don't trust a polarizing self centered egotist like Trump to do that job. At the same time I wouldn't trust the Hildabitch's crap in the office either. The only reason I would have voted for Sanders was he is the only candidate who talked about overturning the Citizens United decision and implementing real campaign finance reform. He has been consistently articulating the message for years that taking the corrupting influence of hidden money out of the system would overthrow the establishment's power structure. The truth is Sanders didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell because he was a threat to the system, and not because he was a leftwing nut. Not say'n he isn't a left nut though. Trumps personality and public demeanor aside, judging by his cabinet picks, clearly his vision for making America great again is empowering those with capital in creating dependence upon the corporation (Republican establishment) rather than dependance upon government (Democratic establishment). The key word here is 'dependance' as in the establishment's social structure of a parent child relationship between the government and the people rather than a government for and by the people. Every time I speak about this stuff here, or say Trump has no desire to put America back in the hands of the common man, I'm accused of being a foil hat waring conspiracy wing nut. Funny thing is I get the same reaction in liberal political forums. It's like both sides feel a need to defend against non polarized centrist reasoning. This goes to the core of the deep fear and divisions now between the left and right. So deep there's talk of civil war on both sides. That's real wing nut shit IMO. OK. You're unblocked. Cival war, people vs. government, is what they're hoping for. This thread is a perfect example of such. Commoners bickering back and forth about the smokescreen we see from MSM given to them by the administration-this would have happened no matter who was at the helm-all the while we're blind to the things only quietly being mentioned. Left vs. Right is not a war I look forward to. 3 Link to comment
240zness Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 In my opinion: It takes scepticism towards everything, Obama may be quite narcissistic. Just hid it well. Someone said most leaders have that personality. I'm concerned with Trumps behaviour. But I think the campaign , American people as well as his cabinet and other world leaders have and will continue to change him for the better Link to comment
Rhapakatui Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Full disclosure: I had a fun plan to make a big joke of this thread. I emailed someone much wiser than myself to let them know that, if they saw me being crazy, it was a troll. She advised me that this was probably too serious an issue for trolling. I've been backing it down since then. ... Ratsun unite. 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 OK. You're unblocked. Cival war, people vs. government, is what they're hoping for. This thread is a perfect example of such. Commoners bickering back and forth about the smokescreen we see from MSM given to them by the administration-this would have happened no matter who was at the helm-all the while we're blind to the things only quietly being mentioned. Left vs. Right is not a war I look forward to. Surely you can't be including GPA in that assessment 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Surely you can't be including GPA in that assessment You get off my nuts. 2 Link to comment
flatcat19 Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Surely you can't be including GPA in that assessment You mean my 2020 campaign hype man? Everyone needs their own Flava Flav. Just ask Chuck D. 1 Link to comment
flatcat19 Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I can see it now. Diego runnkng back and forth across stage, yelling follow the money; down with Soros; Follow that money, boooooyyyyeeeee! 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I can see it now. Diego runnkng back and forth across stage, yelling follow the money; down with Soros; Follow that money, boooooyyyyeeeee! I can rap those lyrics, yo! 1 Link to comment
tr8er Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Full disclosure: I had a fun plan to make a big joke of this thread. I emailed someone much wiser than myself to let them know that, if they saw me being crazy, it was a troll. She advised me that this was probably too serious an issue for trolling. I've been backing it down since then. ... Ratsun unite. 1 Link to comment
Rhapakatui Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Diego runnkng 2 Link to comment
240zness Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 To be fair , and meanwhile in Cali 2 Link to comment
paradime Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Stop attracting attention to Cali, they hate us already. 2 Link to comment
q-tip Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Has anyone ever experieced a hippie handjob? It can be quite healing. That's like, just your opinion man. 2 Link to comment
125 CSL Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I'm telling you, even honorable and intelligent life long conservatives like my father are concerned with Trumps erratic behavior on the world stage. I think it's kind of fucked up that I need to assure Mike that I'm not trolling here, but I do want to make a point, so here you go. My name is Paradime and I stand behind this opinion 100%. I don't need fake or real news to see Trump's behavior is consistent with a narcissistic personality type. In fact I posted this observation and the DSM V criteria under the same context almost a year ago right here in Cuz (page 133). I was responding to dhp123166 http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358654My response http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358662 Saying this is fake news, or comes from some left wing agenda is directly parroting Trump's deflection tactics. The idea that people questioning Trump are "swamp tenders that want to be losers" reflects a demand for absolute obedience to Trump's rhetoric. I want to challenge that defensive thinking, and ask that folks keep an open mind before brushing me off as an educationally brainwashed libtard who's trying to troll everyone because I speak out against Trump. I didn't vote for president this election, because I know dangerous shit (on both sides) when I see it. I'm all about overthrowing the corrupt Washington establishment, but I don't trust a polarizing self centered egotist like Trump to do that job. At the same time I wouldn't trust the Hildabitch's crap in the office either. The only reason I would have voted for Sanders was he is the only candidate who talked about overturning the Citizens United decision and implementing real campaign finance reform. He has been consistently articulating the message for years that taking the corrupting influence of hidden money out of the system would overthrow the establishment's power structure. The truth is Sanders didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell because he was a threat to the system, and not because he was a leftwing nut. Not say'n he isn't a left nut though. Trumps personality and public demeanor aside, judging by his cabinet picks, clearly his vision for making America great again is empowering those with capital in creating dependence upon the corporation (Republican establishment) rather than dependance upon government (Democratic establishment). The key word here is 'dependance' as in the establishment's social structure of a parent child relationship between the government and the people rather than a government for and by the people. Every time I speak about this stuff here, or say Trump has no desire to put America back in the hands of the common man, I'm accused of being a foil hat waring conspiracy wing nut. Funny thing is I get the same reaction in liberal political forums. It's like both sides feel a need to defend against non polarized centrist reasoning. This goes to the core of the deep fear and divisions now between the left and right. So deep there's talk of civil war on both sides. That's real wing nut shit IMO. Oh wow anecdotal evidence with a health dose of fake news talking points to make Nancy Pelosi beam with pride! Yea just what you needed to beat me down. lol. Then there is a whole lot of beating a dead horse. 4 Link to comment
240zness Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/98126274/ 1 Link to comment
Dolomite Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I'm telling you, even honorable and intelligent life long conservatives like my father are concerned with Trumps erratic behavior on the world stage. I think it's kind of fucked up that I need to assure Mike that I'm not trolling here, but I do want to make a point, so here you go. My name is Paradime and I stand behind this opinion 100%. I don't need fake or real news to see Trump's behavior is consistent with a narcissistic personality type. In fact I posted this observation and the DSM V criteria under the same context almost a year ago right here in Cuz (page 133). I was responding to dhp123166 http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358654My response http://community.ratsun.net/topic/63554-cuz-merica/?p=1358662 Saying this is fake news, or comes from some left wing agenda is directly parroting Trump's deflection tactics. The idea that people questioning Trump are "swamp tenders that want to be losers" reflects a demand for absolute obedience to Trump's rhetoric. I want to challenge that defensive thinking, and ask that folks keep an open mind before brushing me off as an educationally brainwashed libtard who's trying to troll everyone because I speak out against Trump. I didn't vote for president this election, because I know dangerous shit (on both sides) when I see it. I'm all about overthrowing the corrupt Washington establishment, but I don't trust a polarizing self centered egotist like Trump to do that job. At the same time I wouldn't trust the Hildabitch's crap in the office either. The only reason I would have voted for Sanders was he is the only candidate who talked about overturning the Citizens United decision and implementing real campaign finance reform. He has been consistently articulating the message for years that taking the corrupting influence of hidden money out of the system would overthrow the establishment's power structure. The truth is Sanders didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell because he was a threat to the system, and not because he was a leftwing nut. Not say'n he isn't a left nut though. Trumps personality and public demeanor aside, judging by his cabinet picks, clearly his vision for making America great again is empowering those with capital in creating dependence upon the corporation (Republican establishment) rather than dependance upon government (Democratic establishment). The key word here is 'dependance' as in the establishment's social structure of a parent child relationship between the government and the people rather than a government for and by the people. Every time I speak about this stuff here, or say Trump has no desire to put America back in the hands of the common man, I'm accused of being a foil hat waring conspiracy wing nut. Funny thing is I get the same reaction in liberal political forums. It's like both sides feel a need to defend against non polarized centrist reasoning. This goes to the core of the deep fear and divisions now between the left and right. So deep there's talk of civil war on both sides. That's real wing nut shit IMO. So trump is bad for being narcissistic, yet you continually post mile long bullshit diatribes and seem to expect people to read it...hypocrisy at it's finest. Whilst not reading 90% percent of this brain drain, I believe I noticed you didn't vote for president. My old man, wise bastard he is, has a saying 'if you didn't vote then shut up because you don't have a right to complain', it has a good amount of relevance in this instance. 4 Link to comment
tr8er Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 Ya know. In an open vote, I agree with Dolomite. But in a 4-6 pre-selected candidate running, I hold less accountability. I appreciate when people write. Real content seems to happen after about five or six sentences. 1 Link to comment
VFR800 Posted February 21, 2017 Report Share Posted February 21, 2017 I've not previously thought anything bad about Milo but if this is accurate then no way Hose could I support anyone with views that sex with underage children is ok. http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2016/s4623793.htm 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts