paradime Posted May 10, 2016 Report Share Posted May 10, 2016 Well, I tried to change the subject, but NoooOOOooo. Wait a minute. fucking anything, including one's self is a true Cuz Mercanism. 2 Link to comment
paradime Posted May 10, 2016 Report Share Posted May 10, 2016 Got my answer elsewhere. I miss John Stewart, he's so unAmerican. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da5VYSPsoE0 1 Link to comment
tr8er Posted May 10, 2016 Report Share Posted May 10, 2016 Senate and house stature drove this election to a significant extent. Then the SCOTUS opened up throwing the GOP into recon mode. Hillary in the White House will cement the GOPs strength in the legislature. Which is arguably a more powerful Dept. If the Supreme Court settles in the Dems favor, then the president becomes a very important seat. I expected Romney to re-enter for this reason. But dividing the anti Hillary demographic is also not going to help. If ever a third party candidate had a chance, it's now. We will see more libertarian votes than ever before if they put up. Still though, all the cards will be shown if Hillary gets the dem ticket. The case against her will go into full media mode. It will be ugly for her. But yes, legislature seats are just as important and always go against the POTUS. Thus I doubt the GOP wanted to win this election. 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted May 10, 2016 Report Share Posted May 10, 2016 Senate and house stature drove this election to a significant extent. Then the SCOTUS opened up throwing the GOP into recon mode. Hillary in the White House will cement the GOPs strength in the legislature. Which is arguably a more powerful Dept. If the Supreme Court settles in the Dems favor, then the president becomes a very important seat. I expected Romney to re-enter for this reason. But dividing the anti Hillary demographic is also not going to help. If ever a third party candidate had a chance, it's now. We will see more libertarian votes than ever before if they put up. Still though, all the cards will be shown if Hillary gets the dem ticket. The case against her will go into full media mode. It will be ugly for her. But yes, legislature seats are just as important and always go against the POTUS. Thus I doubt the GOP wanted to win this election. Do you realize that both DNC and RNC play for the same team? Wake up! 1 Link to comment
RatVonDude Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 SCOTUS isn't that Smokes maiden first name? POTUS is greek for kgb ??? 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Do you realize that the DNC and RNC are the same product just different packaging? Wake up! 2 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Thank you, Paradime....exactly what I was aiming for :thumbup: 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Fuck the government too 3 Link to comment
tr8er Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Do you realize that both DNC and RNC play for the same team? Wake up! Thank you so much for my enlightenment. They are in the same league. But not the same team. And as I chose to live life as a taxpaying citizen, I have an opinion on who outlines our societies mundane laws and policies. While we all agree that the bigger picture is both out of reach, as well as obfuscated beyond approach, the societal construct evolves WITH us. There's a whole lotta shit our officials do affect. 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Thank you so much for my enlightenment. They are in the same league. But not the same team. And as I chose to live life as a taxpaying citizen, I have an opinion on who outlines our societies mundane laws and policies. While we all agree that the bigger picture is both out of reach, as well as obfuscated beyond approach, the societal construct evolves WITH us. There's a whole lotta shit our officials do affect. Bahahaha! Bahaha sheep! 1 Link to comment
thisismatt Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3583937/Several-people-stabbed-Massachusetts-mall.html +1 for guns 2 Link to comment
tr8er Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Bahahaha! Bahaha sheep! Sure. And you are the wise viscous sheep. I fear your intellect and hunter prowess. Please feed on my fellow sheep and spare me your bullshit. 2 Link to comment
MikeRL411 Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Senate and house stature drove this election to a significant extent. Then the SCOTUS opened up throwing the GOP into recon mode. Hillary in the White House will cement the GOPs strength in the legislature. Which is arguably a more powerful Dept. If the Supreme Court settles in the Dems favor, then the president becomes a very important seat. I expected Romney to re-enter for this reason. But dividing the anti Hillary demographic is also not going to help. If ever a third party candidate had a chance, it's now. We will see more libertarian votes than ever before if they put up. Still though, all the cards will be shown if Hillary gets the dem ticket. The case against her will go into full media mode. It will be ugly for her. But yes, legislature seats are just as important and always go against the POTUS. Thus I doubt the GOP wanted to win this election. A Libertarian vote for president only screws up the picture! They have absolutely no chance of electing a pesident! We don't want an Italian election fiasco! A vote for those loosers only throws the "real" selection into the toilet. Remember the F&&& up that Ross Peroit caused! I remember a long time ago when the Italians could not decide who should govern. The Republic of San Marino [yes it does exist on a mountain top in the heart of Italy] had a similar problem. They had 2 competing parties each claiming victory. One of their politicians offred a solution. Draw straws and the looser gets to govern Italy! Link to comment
tr8er Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 A Libertarian vote for president only screws up the picture! They have absolutely no chance of electing a pesident! We don't want an Italian election fiasco! A vote for those loosers only throws the "real" selection into the toilet. Remember the F&&& up that Ross Peroit caused! I remember a long time ago when the Italians could not decide who should govern. The Republic of San Marino [yes it does exist on a mountain top in the heart of Italy] had a similar problem. They had 2 competing parties each claiming victory. One of their politicians offred a solution. Draw straws and the looser gets to govern Italy! Yeah. I just don't agree with this. And in this election cycle, I'm not sure who it would impact more. Third party candidates will draw from red and blue states. We are looking down the barrel of US politics here. Not the first time. But the first time in my life. Link to comment
paradime Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Thank you so much for my enlightenment. They are in the same league. But not the same team. And as I chose to live life as a taxpaying citizen, I have an opinion on who outlines our societies mundane laws and policies. While we all agree that the bigger picture is both out of reach, as well as obfuscated beyond approach, the societal construct evolves WITH us. There's a whole lotta shit our officials do affect. Bahahaha! Bahaha sheep! Pulling each other's chain. I stratal this line in that I don't believe our officials effect nearly enough to correct the broken system. I see $Money$ pulling the leavers in the mundane laws and policies that really effect our lives. All politicians are beholding to their parties wallet, left and right. We know Hildy's on the corporate doll, but trust that Trump isn't looking for Paul Ryan's love on Thursday. He's looking for funding going into the main event. He may be worth billions in real estate paper, but he doesn't have a billion in liquid cash to blow on an election. Although Bernie is pulling down huge individual donor numbers as a primary candidate, there is no way he could compete in the big show without the support of the party establishment's big $ "contributors". Money is what puts a candidate behind the desk in Ameria, and that shit flows threw Washington in mad torrents. Until there is campaign finance reform, I will withhold any optimism when voting. 3 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 Follow the money :( 2 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3583937/Several-people-stabbed-Massachusetts-mall.html +1 for guns It was a cop. Cops carry pistols. The dead guy simply chose to do this with an off duty cop in the audience. It's what cops are trained to handle. Same as if there was a car accident and a doctor was driving by. No one says we should all become doctors to save people in accidents. It's what doctors are trained to handle. Not everyone can b/should be a cop or a doctor. Same with gun ownership. Seems like everyone is expected to have one like a cell phone. 1 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 RNC? DNC? Fuck that, give me RUN DMC!! 2 Link to comment
]2eDeYe Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 It was a cop. Cops carry pistols. The dead guy simply chose to do this with an off duty cop in the audience. It's what cops are trained to handle. Same as if there was a car accident and a doctor was driving by. No one says we should all become doctors to save people in accidents. It's what doctors are trained to handle. Not everyone can b/should be a cop or a doctor. Same with gun ownership. Seems like everyone is expected to have one like a cell phone. So you're saying only fireman should put out fires? 3 Link to comment
thisismatt Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 So you're saying only fireman should put out fires? And only EMTs or paramedics should do CPR...even if bystanders are CPR trained. 1 Link to comment
q-tip Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 And only bus/taxi drivers should drive? 1 Link to comment
DaBlist Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 And only bus/taxi drivers should drive? ...and Asian woman 2 Link to comment
Mattndew76 Posted May 11, 2016 Report Share Posted May 11, 2016 ...and Asian woman No way!!! Experience says everyone should get off the road when she gets behind the wheel ;) 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts