INSMNCS: John Cain

[Mattndew76]

lol.

 

 

Here is a small editorial on how much space humans occupy. 

 

http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/03/7-3-billion-people-one-building.html

[TENDRIL]

well i know that every human on earth shoulder to shoulder can fit in texas or something like that 

[TENDRIL]

but 90% of the earths surface is un farm able , or something like that 

[paradime]

Umm I would believe the science if it wasn't so fucken doctored to fit an agenda from this initial problem you spoke of about unfettered crony capitalism's ruling class..  Pick a club and get on board.

 

The science is never settled, and its arrogant to think we have the answers for anything. Tell me how much in percentage numbers do you think you know about all the knowledge there is to be had about climate science or even economics. 

 

We rely on other professionals to do the work for us and report to everyone else, but if the science is owned and operated by big $$ then guess what we get told?  Any scientist that has a differing  educated opinion than that of the current MOB then instant marginalizing sets in. So drown out reason because its obvious the climate radicals are right. TV told me so.

 

EDIT:

 

Here an editorial about said instance.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/

 

For the passed 35 years the predominant feature of the US capitalist structure has been laissez faire supply side economics, aka lower taxes for corporations and the rich, and free market deregulation. This was put in place to save the shrinking middle class with the thinking the rich will spur growth if they have more money in their pocket to invest. Fast forward, today we have lost 40% more of the middle class, personal and retirement savings have declined 67%, and there has never been a greater division of wealth sense the great depression. not to mention political representation is now being sold to the highest bidder. It doesn't take an economics degree to see this. 

 

You are absolutely right about it being arrogant to think we have the answers for anything, but the goal of science is not to find answers, but to gain understanding by asking questions. The closest thing we have to "answering" anything is having enough conclusive evidence to supports a given hypothesis. Even then that evidence is challenged from all sides in a process called peer review. This editorial piece you provided is the exact opposite of what the scientific process does. 

 

Why would you quote an article from the ultimate capitalist agenda publication on the planet, Forbes though? This self proclaimed "opinion" piece is using the same argument the oil company's scientists have been spouting for years, "All the academic and government funded climatologists are falsifying there data to save their jobs. Find the the truth for yourself, everything you want to know about global climate change, the science behind it, and who is funding it is at your fingertips. Instead of studying it themselves, most people find the opinion that suits what they want to believe. If you don't want to go to all that trouble studying what's actually there, at least find an information source that doesn't have a dog in the fight.

 

http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/accusations-that-climate-science-is-money-driven-reveal-ignorance-of-how-science-is-done/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_conspiracy_theory#Funding

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-behind-climate-change/

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-bennett/the-truth-about-global-warming_b_5201338.html

 

http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/how-we-know-global-warming-is-real/

 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140425-global-warming-pause-climate-science/

[q-tip]

Smug pollution is a bad deal...

[TENDRIL]

you folks are looking way too into it, keep it simple, stupid 

[Rjawm]

For the passed 35 years the predominant feature of the US capitalist structure has been laissez faire supply side economics, aka lower taxes for corporations and the rich, and free market deregulation. This was put in place to save the shrinking middle class with the thinking the rich will spur growth if they have more money in their pocket to invest. Fast forward, today we have lost 40% more of the middle class, personal and retirement savings have declined 67%, and there has never been a greater division of wealth sense the great depression. not to mention political representation is now being sold to the highest bidder. It doesn't take an economics degree to see this. 

 

You are absolutely right about it being arrogant to think we have the answers for anything, but the goal of science is not to find answers, but to gain understanding by asking questions. The closest thing we have to "answering" anything is having enough conclusive evidence to supports a given hypothesis. Even then that evidence is challenged from all sides in a process called peer review. This editorial piece you provided is the exact opposite of what the scientific process does. 

 

Why would you quote an article from the ultimate capitalist agenda publication on the planet, Forbes though? This self proclaimed "opinion" piece is using the same argument the oil company's scientists have been spouting for years, "All the academic and government funded climatologists are falsifying there data to save their jobs. Find the the truth for yourself, everything you want to know about global climate change, the science behind it, and who is funding it is at your fingertips. Instead of studying it themselves, most people find the opinion that suits what they want to believe. If you don't want to go to all that trouble studying what's actually there, at least find an information source that doesn't have a dog in the fight.

 

http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/accusations-that-climate-science-is-money-driven-reveal-ignorance-of-how-science-is-done/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_conspiracy_theory#Funding

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-behind-climate-change/

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-bennett/the-truth-about-global-warming_b_5201338.html

 

http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/how-we-know-global-warming-is-real/

 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140425-global-warming-pause-climate-science/

 

*past

[MicroMachinery]

:rofl:

[KoHeartsGPA]

Smug pollution is a bad deal...

So were Bush and Obama, they were reelected!

[q-tip]

True but if the smug from George Clooneys acceptance speech convergest with the smug from all of the "green" car drivers it will be.... Thats right, the perfect storm of self satisfaction..... We would all be doomed...

[Rhapakatui]

Let's play you have 5 mins. Before everything you own is gone

What do you grab

 

My wife keeps a folder with copies of important paperwork and such...  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...I'd probably grab her ass when she bent over to get that.

[q-tip]

+1 for Texas...

[Mattndew76]

For the passed 35 years the predominant feature of the US capitalist structure has been laissez faire supply side economics, aka lower taxes for corporations and the rich, and free market deregulation. This was put in place to save the shrinking middle class with the thinking the rich will spur growth if they have more money in their pocket to invest. Fast forward, today we have lost 40% more of the middle class, personal and retirement savings have declined 67%, and there has never been a greater division of wealth sense the great depression. not to mention political representation is now being sold to the highest bidder. It doesn't take an economics degree to see this. 

 

You are absolutely right about it being arrogant to think we have the answers for anything, but the goal of science is not to find answers, but to gain understanding by asking questions. The closest thing we have to "answering" anything is having enough conclusive evidence to supports a given hypothesis. Even then that evidence is challenged from all sides in a process called peer review. This editorial piece you provided is the exact opposite of what the scientific process does. 

 

Why would you quote an article from the ultimate capitalist agenda publication on the planet, Forbes though? This self proclaimed "opinion" piece is using the same argument the oil company's scientists have been spouting for years, "All the academic and government funded climatologists are falsifying there data to save their jobs. Find the the truth for yourself, everything you want to know about global climate change, the science behind it, and who is funding it is at your fingertips. Instead of studying it themselves, most people find the opinion that suits what they want to believe. If you don't want to go to all that trouble studying what's actually there, at least find an information source that doesn't have a dog in the fight.

 

http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/accusations-that-climate-science-is-money-driven-reveal-ignorance-of-how-science-is-done/

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_conspiracy_theory#Funding

 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-behind-climate-change/

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-bennett/the-truth-about-global-warming_b_5201338.html

 

http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/how-we-know-global-warming-is-real/

 

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/04/140425-global-warming-pause-climate-science/

 

 

Sources are all editorial opinion and funded by left political money.. You just puke up the same shit that I said was the problem.

 

I can pull up 30 sources that rebuke any of that shit too with academia credentials as well.

 

Your profession is the psych so why pretend you have any such credential with climate ideology? 

[hobospyder]

Let's play you have 5 mins. Before everything you own is gone

What do you grab

all the car keys off the desk

 

and then my daughter

[a.d._510_n_ok]

[paradime]

Sources are all editorial opinion and funded by left political money.. You just puke up the same shit that I said was the problem.

 

I can pull up 30 sources that rebuke any of that shit too with academia credentials as well.

 

Your profession is the psych so why pretend you have any such credential with climate ideology? 

 

So you're saying you were unswayed by my argument? Fair enough, but what makes you so sure you're right? Seriously. 

[Mattndew76]

I am neither right or wrong as in your case.

 

You believe in the new ideology of exaggerated human impact. Where I believe that warming and cooling are cyclic and we really don't have the impact that most arrogantly think we do.

 

But neither I or you hold any credential of our opinions. We can only regurgitate the opinions of others that in fact neither of us know personally for sure that it's truly uninfluenced observation. I can create an outcome or in many cases find the truth I seek as you can as well.

 

My original point was that we no longer have unbiased information or maybe we never did. You seem like a rational person that could understand that mob mentality doesn't mean it's the correct mentality.

 

When these so called scientific people you align with start asking for federal agencies to prosecute and even imprison people who have differing view kinda gives a clue that the fix is in.

[KoHeartsGPA]

So you're saying you were unswayed by my argument? Fair enough, but what makes you so sure you're right? Seriously.

 

 

 

/raises hand

 

 

 

 

Follow the money, brotha!

 

 

That's what makes one sure, you'll also discover by following the money trail, that in many issues both left and right are in the same pocket.....the globalist's pocket.

 

 

 

 

Now that should allow you to understand why Donald Trump has so much support, he's the only candidate that pisses off the establishment, I'm not saying I support him, but I do cautiously like what he's doing, and I stay in the side of caution because in the back of my head I'm wondering.....what if this is just an act?, what if he's pulling an Obama on us?

 

 

 

Food for thought!!!

[bananahamuck]

Every time you turn on the news they are talking marijuana this,, marijuana that,,,,,,,,,,,, FUCK MARIJUANA!!... Me personally i am investing in building my own privately owned death camps..  I figure i could run them for less than half what the goverment is running theirs for now,, so all i have to do is lease mine out like those for profit prisons they have in Arizona.......................... And sit back and watch the money roll in.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Mattndew76]

B-Nanners

 

The for profit prison system is a scary entity on the real!!!!

[RatVonDude]

Every time you turn on the news they are talking marijuana this,, marijuana that,,,,,,,,,,,, FUCK MARIJUANA!!... Me personally i am investing in building my own privately owned death camps..  I figure i could run them for less than half what the goverment is running theirs for now,, so all i have to do is lease mine out like those for profit prisons they have in Arizona.......................... And sit back and watch the money roll in.

 

 

If you actually killed your prisoners within 24 hours of notifying them that they are going to be kill,

 

it wouldn't be considered cruel and in humane.

[RatVonDude]

hey if animals can fuck up a drone so can humans

 

I almost fucked one up the other day, some dork brought it to the park. 

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F8sPBsR9Lo

[bananahamuck]

If you actually killed your prisoners within 24 hours of notifying them that they are going to be kill,

 

it wouldn't be considered cruel and in humane.

 

 

Hmmm i was thinking more along the lines of notifying them of their death date in the certified letter they will receive from our armed,  barrier breaching   "welcoming unit"  at their doorstep the day of their notification of internment ,,, as soon after the "lottery" as possible..

[RatVonDude]

Hmmm i was thinking more along the lines of notifying them of their death date in the certified letter they will receive from our armed,  barrier breaching   "welcoming unit"  at their doorstep the day of their notification of internment ,,, as soon after the "lottery" as possible..

 

thats really humane,

 

like my boy Washushe

 

he just bites face for about thirty minutes til the final twitch

 

 

 

ps

this will never get old

[Mattndew76]

Little red mink is a cute badass