a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Michelle Obama will be a tough one to beat as well. She is very well spoken, and can deliver a speech.. Has globalist backers.. Barry as a husband. Hillary, if not in jail.. might try again. Bernie... if not dead yet, might try again. Michelle has to answer to a generation of new voters for taking a massive shit on their lunch trays for eight years. They are bitter, numerous and they know her fucking name. Hillary is a corpse politically and not even as well preserved as Lenin physically or in stature. Bernie...Bernie...Bernie...Bernie. He hates Trump for winning a fair election more than he hates Hillary for stealing away the democrat nomination that enabled Trump to come to power. That's a special kind of fucktardery but he's a socialist so what do you expect? Also, Bernie's appeal was the product of a hopeless young generation mired in a god awful economy. You millenials get shit on way too much when a lot of older people just don't understand that you guys have never really experienced a decent economy. I hope/pray these tax cuts and the removal of illegal cheap labor creates an economic boom that makes your wallets explode. Bernie can't win in '20. He won't run in '20. His embittered (towards the DNC) supporters will be major players for at least the next two election cycles. Pic related: Link to comment
Draker Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 ...not hrc, her controversies will drag on. They have been surrounded by controversy since their days in Arkansas. Now that their safety net is disintegrating, you might be right. Link to comment
Draker Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Michelle has to answer to a generation of new voters for taking a massive shit on their lunch trays for eight years. They are bitter, numerous and they know her fucking name. Hillary is a corpse politically and not even as well preserved as Lenin physically or in stature. Bernie...Bernie...Bernie...Bernie. Bernie can't win in '20. He won't run in '20. His embittered (towards the DNC) supporters will be major players for at least the next two election cycles. But what you've left out is that money can be made from running and losing, and if money can be made, losers will run. Ask Bernie how he bought that new lake house after losing the primaries. 2 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Ask Bernie how he his chump supporters bought that new lake house after losing the primaries. fixed it for ya and I dig what your saying. also, you may be more cynical than me! socialist Bernie taking another run for the White House strictly for the cash! I ain't saying you're wrong. Damn....wow.....yeah......you got me wondering about it now. that would be cold-blooded. commie cold-blooded. 2 Link to comment
racerx Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 Bernie attended Trumpcheetos real estate seminar at Trump U and was an excellent and bought the house with no down payment. 2 Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted January 8, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 fixed it for ya and I dig what your saying.also, you may be more cynical than me!socialist Bernie taking another run for the White House strictly for the cash!I ain't saying you're wrong.Damn....wow.....yeah......you got me wondering about it now.that would be cold-blooded.commie cold-blooded. I have a Che tshirt I bought in Hong Kong (as well as a Mao shirt). I wear them occasionally and it’s interesting to see the looks on people’s faces when they see a six foot 220lb tattooed skinhead with a commie lefty tshirt on. The Mao one doesn’t get the same reaction. I still want a Trump make America great tshirt and a Sillary one that I can wear to fuck with peoples heads. 3 Link to comment
racerx Posted January 8, 2018 Report Share Posted January 8, 2018 "A fool shows his annoyance at once but a prudent man overlooks an insult, proverbs 12:16 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Yeah it says FOX news. but watch it.. Cuz this is what i think of you 3 "helping" us poor unedumacated minorities ,, help ourselves I watched it.If this isn't hypocritical what is ? these kids assuming and pointing out how a person of color has a more difficult time getting an ID card for various reasons.Talk about prejudice.If a white male over 40 said anything to that effect he would be labeled a racist. Link to comment
john510 Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 It just gets funnier. Oprah as a Presidential candidate. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/entertainment/oprah-for-president-winfrey-fans-urge-white-house-run-after-metoo-speech-20180108-h0fcz4.html That is not funny at all.Just the thought is scary. Nobody in their right mind would back her for a second tilt at the Presidency. Would they? Yes they would,the Democrats don't seem to be in their right mind anymore. 2 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Alex Jones Is Reportedly Banned From Google (and Other Things We Learned From James Damore’s Class-action Lawsuit) James Damore, the infamous ex-Google engineer who was fired in August after writing a multipage, anti-diversity memo, is back at it again. Today, Damore and his attorney, Harmeet Dhillon — Dhillon is a civil-rights attorney who is also the National Committeewoman of the Republican National Committee for California — announced that they are suing Google for discrimination against conservative, white men. The suit claims that Google uses “extreme” and “illegal” practices to keep these dudes down. It’s not a totally surprising filing given Damore filed a federal labor complaint last year and began working with Dhillon during August 2017 on “fact gathering” — looking for other white dudes who felt wronged by Google — for what would eventually become today’s complaint. The document comes in at over 150 pages, so let us save you a little bit of reading — you can find the whole mess here if you’re feeling ambitious — and share a few of the, uh, more interesting things it contains. Google apparently has it out for straight couples, but furries are welcome. “Google furnishes a large number of internal mailing lists catering to employees with alternative lifestyles, including furries, polygamy, transgenderism, and plurality discussing sexual topics,” reads the complaint. (Note the use of the term transgenderism, which, well, isn’t how anybody in 2018 should be talking about the transgender community.) “The only lifestyle that seems to not be openly discussed on Google’s internal forums is traditional heterosexual monogamy.” This section of the complaint also references a presentation from an employee who identifies as “a yellow-scaled wingless dragonkin” and another who identifies as “an expansive ornate building.” At least one of Damore’s former co-workers received a bonus for speaking out against his memo. Damore also received threatening emails while still at the company, “You’re a misogynist and a terrible person. I will keep hounding you until one of us is fired. Fuck you,” wrote one of Damore’s fellow engineers. White men at Google are booed just for being white men at Google. “Not only was the numerical presence of women celebrated at Google solely due to their gender, but the presence of Caucasians and males was mocked with ‘boos’ during company-wide weekly meetings.” http://nymag.com/selectall/2018/01/most-interesting-parts-of-james-damores-class-action-filing.html Link to comment
tr8er Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 This is the difference between two VERY different statements A. People without ID have higher likelihood of being a minority. B. Minirities have a harder time getting ID's. Very different statements. One is an accurate statement. One is how the right spins the argument to look racist. You go ahead and guess which is which. I know it's really tough, but I bet you can do it. Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted January 9, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Yes they would,the Democrats don't seem to be in their right mind anymore. From my armchair interest in/following of Murican politics, would I be wrong in saying the majority of Democrats haven’t ever been in a stable frame of mind? 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Bernie attended Trumpcheetos real estate seminar at Trump U and was an excellent and bought the house with no down payment. Socialist Bernie must not have shared the wealth.....of information....with his wife. Grand jury seeks testimony about Bernie Sanders' wife, $10M college loan: report 6 hours ago They’re trying to pull together where did the money come from to enable Burlington College to convince (People’s United Bank) and the diocese to go ahead with the deal,” Lloyd told the Burlington Free Press. Sanders reportedly told college trustees and bank lenders that the college had millions of dollars in donations that could be used to repay the loan. The land was purchased from the Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington. Lloyd reportedly was questioned by Paul Van de Graaf, the chief of the criminal division for the U.S. attorneys’ office in Vermont. At the time, Sanders sought a $6.5 million loan from People’s United Bank to buy tax-exempt bonds issued by a state agency, and a $3.65 million second mortgage from the Roman Catholic Dioceses of Burlington. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/08/grand-jury-seeks-testimony-about-bernie-sanders-wife-10m-college-loan-report.html maybe Bernie was busy stealing his neighbor's paper that morning. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 What you might not know about me, although being white as F.. also a registered tribe member. Q is the whitest guy I have ever met. Prove me wrong. Michelle Obama will be a tough one to beat as well. She is very well spoken, and can deliver a speech.. Has globalist backers.. Barry as a husband. Hillary, if not in jail.. might try again. Bernie... if not dead yet, might try again. It's going to be a loaded group. Not a walk in the park by any means. The mid-terms are going to be a huge factor in this as well. If the majorities shift, so to does the ability to get anything done. The two parties are too far divided to work together. Maybe on infrastructure, but I really doubt it. The Tic has way too much political and criminal baggage to run. Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 I have a Che tshirt I bought in Hong Kong (as well as a Mao shirt). I wear them occasionally and it’s interesting to see the looks on people’s faces when they see a six foot 220lb tattooed skinhead with a commie lefty tshirt on. The Mao one doesn’t get the same reaction. I still want a Trump make America great tshirt and a Sillary one that I can wear to fuck with peoples heads. 1 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Waste of skin breathing our air. Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 folks, people will go to prison. Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis… This outline is the story of how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose. This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history. This outline is also the story of how one man’s action likely saved our constitutional republic. His name is Admiral Mike Rogers. I’m calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration “Operation Condor”. Those of you familiar with the film “Three Days of The Condor” will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of “Condor”. On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016. FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.* I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesn’t use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH “Bill” Priestap’s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes: FBI Director James Comey was caught entirely off guard by that first three minutes of that questioning. He simply didn’t anticipate it. Oversight protocol requires the FBI Director to tell the congressional intelligence “Gang of Eight” of any counterintelligence operations. The Go8 has oversight into these ops at the highest level of classification. In July 2016 the time the operation began, oversight was the responsibility of this group, the Gang of Eight. Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”. FBI Director James Comey told congress on March 20th, 2017, the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it. In 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE). The Office of Inspector General. Michael Horowitz, requested oversight over the DOJ National Security Division and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD. The White House -the executive branch- is also a host of intelligence information and consequently the White House has their own SCIF which holds intelligence products they would create (very little), or intelligence products created for them (the vast majority). An example of a product created for the executive branch would be the President’s Daily Briefing (PDB). The PDB as a whole product would only exist in the White House SCIF. Parts of the PDB would be hosted by the originating participant, ex. NSA, FBI, DOJ, DoD, CIA State Dept. etc., but only the White House would have the fully assembled product. After all, it’s assembled for the President. Putting the “Oversight” structure together with the “Compartmented” intelligence security you will note that only a few people ‘could’ traditionally access the full PDB. However, under President Obama the President’s Daily Brief went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB: […] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state. In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers. By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link) Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to more than 30 recipients including: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”. During an MSNBC interview about her unmasking U.S. citizens within intelligence reports, in April 2017, President Obama’s National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”…. So under President Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB. An example of an Obama Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas. With dozens of people having access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of names within the intelligence product gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, likely did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes. This political outcome was essentially confirmed by Evelyn Farkas who was one of the downstream recipients of the unmasked intelligence. If the House Intelligence Committee, or Senate Intelligence Committee, as a whole – wanted to see the President’s Daily Briefing, they would have to request the individual components from the individual intelligence agencies because the PDB product was not created for them; it was created for the Office of The President. Only the Chairman and Minority leader from each Intel committee could go to the White House to see the PDB end product. [Remember, they alone are four of the Gang-of-Eight.] This is why Devin Nunes, who is a Go8 member, has to request the intelligence from each department (NSA, DOJ, FBI etc.) in order to share it with the oversight committee. Nunes can review the ‘executive SCIF product’ but cannot export or import intelligence product he did not create. As many of you are aware, immediately following the 2016 presidential election NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower to meet with president-elect Donald Trump. The day AFTER the Rogers visit, President-elect Trump moved his transition team out of Trump Tower to Bedminister New Jersey. We always suspected NSA Director Rogers gave President-elect Trump a head’s up of sorts. Later, during the December 2016 and Jan, Feb, March, April 2017 Russian Conspiracy frenzy, when the entire intelligence community seemed to be collectively leaking against Trump’s interests, those suspicions gained even greater likelihood. However, what we learned in 2017 about the activity in 2016 almost guarantees that was exactly what happened. That back-story also ties into both the FISA issue and the Devin Nunes concern. Admiral Mike Rogers became NSA director in April 2014. Sometime in early 2016 Admiral Rogers became aware of “ongoing” and “intentional” violations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Section 702 surveillance. Specifically item #17 which includes the unauthorized upstream data collection of U.S. individuals within NSA surveillance. Section 702 – Item #17 “About Queries” is specifically the collection of emails, and phone call surveillance of U.S. persons. The public doesn’t discover this issue, and NSA Director Rogers action, until May 2017 when we learn that Rogers told the FISA court he became aware of unlawful surveillance and collection of U.S. persons. Put into context, with the full back-story, it appears that 2016 surveillance was the political surveillance now in the headlines; the stuff Chairman Nunes is currently questioning. The dates here are important as they tell a story. As a result of Rogers suspecting [FISA 702 (#17 – email and phone calls)] surveillance activity was being used for reasons he deemed unlawful, in mid 2016 Rogers...... In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday (the day after the 2016 election) at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/05/operation-condor-how-nsa-director-mike-rogers-saved-the-u-s-from-a-massive-constitutional-crisis/ Link to comment
Draker Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Q is the whitest guy I have ever met. Prove me wrong. Fact, no one is whiter than q. Althrough, Here is my year book photo. 3 Link to comment
VFR800 Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Fact, no one is whiter than q. I thought my arse was white till I saw Q's legs. Link to comment
q-tip Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 I thought my arse was white till I saw Q's legs. Can't argue with that.... 1 Link to comment
racerx Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 No one is whiter and pale than Trumpcheeto, he puts on make up Link to comment
flyerdan Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Building off of a.d.510's post a few back... Michael Savage mentioned on his show yesterday that he had a personal visit from someone big in the media from back east who has details on something really big that could cause some major upheavals. Details will be available on Wednesdays show. It's not like him to hyperbole some teapot tempest, so I'm hoping that it brings down the widespread media collusion against Trump. As for Oprah, she has likability and the money; the best thing would be for Hillary to steal the primary (again) so she could once again jaw defeat from the snatch of victory in the general. 3 Link to comment
240zness Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Does anyone watch or listen to trump enough and think he has dementia?? Self conscious, narcasisstic, but rock solid Junk yard dog like Doesn't really matter who the president is. Seen the evidence for deep state in FBI ,etc? Ivanka would beat those broads .. does Oprah even have a thought about china trade , or regulations ? We know Michelle is very successful with no accomplishments. Link to comment
240zness Posted January 9, 2018 Report Share Posted January 9, 2018 Snatch of victory" Chasing tail spinning shit everywhere" LOL This thread is rollin 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts