racerx Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 California Assemblyman accused of forcing lobbyist into bathroom and masturbating Sacramento lobbyist Pamela Lopez has claimed that, in 2016, Democratic Assemblyman Matt Dababneh followed her into a bathroom, masturbated in front of her and urged her to touch him. Dababneh has strongly denied the allegation. "It was Matt Dababneh," Lopez told The Times in a November interview. http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-matt-dababneh-harassment-20171204-story.html Now, if that was one of us at work we be a gonner. Speaking of which what is Anthony Wiener up to these days. Link to comment
Draker Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Be more specific. Link to comment
racerx Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you can not fool the people all of the time. A. Lincoln. Link to comment
dhp123166 Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Be more specific. Well for one thing Abraham Lincoln was assassinated... 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 FBI agent dismissed from Mueller probe changed Comey's description of Clinton to 'extremely careless' Washington (CNN) — A former top counterintelligence expert at the FBI, now at the center of a political uproar for exchanging private messages that appeared to mock President Donald Trump, changed a key phrase in former FBI Director James Comey's description of how former secretary of state Hillary Clinton handled classified information, according to US officials familiar with the matter. Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said. http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Well for one thing Abraham Lincoln was assassinated... Sure was.. Still voted one of the best presidents of all time. 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Travel Ban has been ruled constitutional via 7-2 vote of the supreme court... And now full travel ban will take effect. http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/363183-supreme-court-allows-full-trump-travel-ban-to-take-effect 3 Link to comment
racerx Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Sure was.. Still voted one of the best presidents of all time. ...depends, if you are from South, then most likely not. 1 Link to comment
VFR800 Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 ...depends, if you are from South, then most likely not. Draker I suspect is referring to most popular POTUS's of all time in modern stats. 2 Link to comment
Draker Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 18 polls going back to 1948, Lincoln finishes on average at #1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_presidents_of_the_United_States 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Be more specific. Oh, Okay There were 6 candidates in the 1860 election so 50% does not translate. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was unpopular in the South for obvious reasons, but the title of most unpopular president in history is all Trumps. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was elected to the Illinois Legislature in 1834, and reelected in 1836, 1838, 1840, and 1844. Besides his law career, Lincoln continued his involvement in politics, serving in the United States House of Representatives from Illinois in 1846. Stupid comparison. Not even going to justify the stupidity of comparing Lincoln's intellect or public image with Trumps. Just plane stupid How could a political party secede? Stupid comparison. No such thing as approval ratings in the 1800s. Stupid comparison, but if it holds true the Rep party is in for a thrashing in 2018. Are they seriously comparing the fringe scuffle between ANFIFA and White Nationalists to the civil war? Stupid comparison. Fascism didn't even exist in 1860. Stupid comparison. Got any more? 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Oh, Okay There were 6 candidates in the 1860 election so 50% does not translate. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was unpopular in the South for obvious reasons, but the title of most unpopular president in history is all Trumps. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was elected to the Illinois Legislature in 1834, and reelected in 1836, 1838, 1840, and 1844. Besides his law career, Lincoln continued his involvement in politics, serving in the United States House of Representatives from Illinois in 1846. Stupid comparison. Not even going to justify the stupidity of comparing Lincoln's intellect or public image with Trumps. Just plane stupid How could a political party secede? Stupid comparison. No such thing as approval ratings in the 1800s. Stupid comparison, but if it holds true the Rep party is in for a thrashing in 2018. Are they seriously comparing the fringe scuffle between ANFIFA and White Nationalists to the civil war? Stupid comparison. Fascism didn't even exist in 1860. Stupid comparison. Got any more? Pic unrelated. Link to comment
dhp123166 Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Be more specific. If you are comparing 11 months of a Trump presidency to Abraham Lincolns almost complete term, and his historical legacy that has survived 150 years of political evolution and revisionism... ...then I seriously overestimated your intelligence. Of course you could be just trolling too, and on that note, I can play as well!!!!! Link to comment
paradime Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Be more specific. Totally related. 1 Link to comment
racerx Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 If you are comparing 11 months of a Trump presidency to Abraham Lincolns almost complete term, and his historical legacy that has survived 150 years of political evolution and revisionism... ...then I seriously overestimated your intelligence. Of course you could be just trolling too, and on that note, I can play as well!!!!! ...I think he's serious and I can't believe he's serious but then again... Link to comment
john510 Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all of the time but you can not fool the people all of the time. A. Lincoln. You sure you have this saying right ? Link to comment
john510 Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 After Steinle verdict, rep unveils bill to imprison officials who shelter illegal immigrants Indiana Rep. Todd Rokita’s bill is one of the most aggressive pieces of legislation to date aimed at sanctuary city policies, going beyond the Justice Department’s threat to cut off grants to those jurisdictions. “Politicians don’t get to pick and choose what laws to comply with,” Rokita told Fox News. “Americans are dying because politicians sworn to uphold the law refuse to do so.” His “Stopping Lawless Actions of Politicians (SLAP) Act” would hold state and local lawmakers criminally responsible for refusing to comply with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The Republican’s bill would subject violators to a $1 million fine and up to five years in prison if they are convicted. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/04/after-steinle-verdict-rep-unveils-bill-to-imprison-officials-who-shelter-illegal-immigrants.html Pretty sad a politician has to unveil a bill to make sure politicians uphold laws (not purposely break them) with another law. Link to comment
Draker Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 I posted a picture. You two did the comparisons. Oh, Okay There were 6 candidates in the 1860 election so 50% does not translate. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was unpopular in the South for obvious reasons, but the title of most unpopular president in history is all Trumps. Stupid comparison. Lincoln was elected to the Illinois Legislature in 1834, and reelected in 1836, 1838, 1840, and 1844. Besides his law career, Lincoln continued his involvement in politics, serving in the United States House of Representatives from Illinois in 1846. Stupid comparison. Not even going to justify the stupidity of comparing Lincoln's intellect or public image with Trumps. Just plane stupid How could a political party secede? Stupid comparison. No such thing as approval ratings in the 1800s. Stupid comparison, but if it holds true the Rep party is in for a thrashing in 2018. Are they seriously comparing the fringe scuffle between ANFIFA and White Nationalists to the civil war? Stupid comparison. Fascism didn't even exist in 1860. Stupid comparison. Got any more? If you are comparing 11 months of a Trump presidency to Abraham Lincolns almost complete term, and his historical legacy that has survived 150 years of political evolution and revisionism... ...then I seriously overestimated your intelligence. Of course you could be just trolling too, and on that note, I can play as well!!!!! 1 Link to comment
racerx Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 You sure you have this saying right ?...correct me, I'm willing to learn. Link to comment
paradime Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 I believe it's You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Link to comment
paradime Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 I posted a picture. You two did the comparisons. That's even more retarded than the picture you posted. 1 Link to comment
john510 Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time,but you cannot fool ALL the people all the time. 1 Link to comment
paradime Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Republican Party Platforms May 17, 1860 Resolved, That we, the delegated representatives of the Republican electors of the United States in Convention assembled, in discharge of the duty we owe to our constituents and our country, unite in the following declarations: 1. That the history of the nation during the last four years, has fully established the propriety and necessity of the organization and perpetuation of the Republican party, and that the causes which called it into existence are permanent in their nature, and now, more than ever before, demand its peaceful and constitutional triumph. 2. That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, "That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed," is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the Rights of the States, and the Union of the States must and shall be preserved. 3. That to the Union of the States this nation owes its unprecedented increase in population, its surprising development of material resources, its rapid augmentation of wealth, its happiness at home and its honor abroad; and we hold in abhorrence all schemes for disunion, come from whatever source they may. And we congratulate the country that no Republican member of Congress has uttered or countenanced the threats of disunion so often made by Democratic members, without rebuke and with applause from their political associates; and we denounce those threats of disunion, in case of a popular overthrow of their ascendency as denying the vital principles of a free government, and as an avowal of contemplated treason, which it is the imperative duty of an indignant people sternly to rebuke and forever silence. 4. That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the states, and especially the right of each state to order and control its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is essential to that balance of powers on which the perfection and endurance of our political fabric depends; and we denounce the lawless invasion by armed force of the soil of any state or territory, no matter under what pretext, as among the gravest of crimes. 5. That the present Democratic Administration has far exceeded our worst apprehensions, in its measureless subserviency to the exactions of a sectional interest, as especially evinced in its desperate exertions to force the infamous Lecompton Constitution upon the protesting people of Kansas; in construing the personal relations between master and servant to involve an unqualified property in persons; in its attempted enforcement everywhere, on land and sea, through the intervention of Congress and of the Federal Courts of the extreme pretensions of a purely local interest; and in its general and unvarying abuse of the power intrusted to it by a confiding people. 6. That the people justly view with alarm the reckless extravagance which pervades every department of the Federal Government; that a return to rigid economy and accountability is indispensable to arrest the systematic plunder of the public treasury by favored partisans; while the recent startling developments of frauds and corruptions at the Federal metropolis, show that an entire change of administration is imperatively demanded. 7. That the new dogma that the Constitution, of its own force, carries slavery into any or all of the territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with contemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent; is revolutionary in its tendency, and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country. 8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom: That, as our Republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that "no persons should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the Constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of Congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to slavery in any territory of the United States. 9. That we brand the recent reopening of the African slave trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age; and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic 10. That in the recent vetoes, by their Federal Governors, of the acts of the legislatures of Kansas and Nebraska, prohibiting slavery in those territories, we find a practical illustration of the boasted Democratic principle of Non-Intervention and Popular Sovereignty, embodied in the Kansas-Nebraska Bill, and a demonstration of the deception and fraud involved therein. 11. That Kansas should, of right, be immediately admitted as a state under the Constitution recently formed and adopted by her people, and accepted by the House of Representatives. 12. That, while providing revenue for the support of the general government by duties upon imports, sound policy requires such an adjustment of these imports as to encourage the development of the industrial interests of the whole country; and we commend that policy of national exchanges, which secures to the workingmen liberal wages, to agriculture remunerative prices, to mechanics and manufacturers an adequate reward for their skill, labor, and enterprise, and to the nation commercial prosperity and independence. 13. That we protest against any sale or alienation to others of the public lands held by actual settlers, and against any view of the free-homestead policy which regards the settlers as paupers or suppliants for public bounty; and we demand the passage by Congress of the complete and satisfactory homestead measure which has already passed the House. 14. That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad. 15. That appropriations by Congress for river and harbor improvements of a national character, required for the accommodation and security of an existing commerce, are authorized by the Constitution, and justified by the obligation of Government to protect the lives and property of its citizens. 16. That a railroad to the Pacific Ocean is imperatively demanded by the interests of the whole country; that the federal government ought to render immediate and efficient aid in its construction; and that, as preliminary thereto, a daily overland mail should be promptly established. 17. Finally, having thus set forth our distinctive principles and views, we invite the co-operation of all citizens, however differing on other questions, who substantially agree with us in their affirmance and support. Link to comment
Recommended Posts