Mattndew76 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Edumication off them there unedumicated soles iz wot Ii iz bout. The grammar is impeccable.. :D 1 Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted October 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 The grammar is impeccable.. :D I got hillarys speech witer to write it for me :) 2 Link to comment
Mattndew76 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 I asked for some assistance from them and just ended up raped. Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted October 19, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 I asked for some assistance from them and just ended up raped. Which, is sadly what RW believes will happen to Murica if she gets elected. 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 This one is pretty bad... almost as bad I've seen. 80-page file containing numerous HRC paid speech quotes - See attachments tab. Snippets from the 80 page document: Bombshell - "HRC ADMITS TO FRAMING A COMPLETELY INNOCENT MAN" 1 Link to comment
Draker Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 If you want a source.. page 16/80 from that PDF. http://unfittorun.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/HRC_speech_summary_key_points.pdf Wikileaks docx version found here on attachment tab: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927 1 Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 When Trump makes it a point to call all reporters assholes at every event, you can't really expect they would help him get elected. Dick did about the same from 1960-68 and won but when the reporters eventually found dirt on him it was like a 1000 starving dingoes jumping on a chubby baby in a bacon onesie with a diaper full of Milk Bones so yeah it wasn't/isn't the best long-term strategy :thumbup: :rofl:! the thing is, the press always hated Nixon but always loved left-leaning Trump. if Donald didn't have ice water for plasma he probably would have had a nervous breakdown over the way the 4th Estate kicked him in the Christmas ornaments for Hillary. 3 Link to comment
john510 Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 When Trump makes it a point to call all reporters assholes at every event, you can't really expect they would help him get elected. They are a business at the core. I don't watch any news station ever unless it's a clip like this posted online so I don't really know who's supporting who, but I wouldn't expect ANY SOURCE to be unbiased. No such thing. There's a reason Trump calls them assholes,they are.The media should not be helping anybody get elected,especially by using fiction or even lies with their reporting.Watch an hour or two of CNN or visit the Yahoo news page.All unfair and unbalanced.Trump is beat up daily yet Clinton's scandals get absolutely no coverage when they should ! Clinton's BS happened while she was in a position of power (government) Trumps faults occurred as a regular citizen.The media is a propaganda machine and a lot of the big players support,guess who ? 2 Link to comment
wayno Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Who selects the Electors? Choosing each state's Electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each state choose slates of potential Electors sometime before the general election. Second, on Election Day, the voters in each state select their state's Electors by casting their ballots for President. The first part of the process is controlled by the political parties in each state and varies from state to state. Generally, the parties either nominate slates of potential Electors at their state party conventions or they chose them by a vote of the party's central committee. This happens in each state for each party by whatever rules the state party and (sometimes) the national party have for the process. This first part of the process results in each Presidential candidate having their own unique slate of potential Electors. Political parties often choose Electors for the slate to recognize their service and dedication to that political party. They may be state elected officials, state party leaders, or people in the state who have a personal or political affiliation with their party's Presidential candidate. (For specific information about how slates of potential Electors are chosen, contact the political parties in each state.) The second part of the process happens on Election Day. When the voters in each state cast votes for the Presidential candidate of their choice they are voting to select their state's Electors. The potential Electors' names may or may not appear on the ballot below the name of the Presidential candidates, depending on election procedures and ballot formats in each state. The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential Electors are appointed as the state's Electors—except in Nebraska and Maine, which have proportional distribution of the Electors. In Nebraska and Maine, the state winner receives two Electors and the winner of each congressional district (who may be the same as the overall winner or a different candidate) receives one Elector. This system permits the Electors from Nebraska and Maine to be awarded to more than one candidate. Are there restrictions on who the Electors can vote for? There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. Some states, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—Electors bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that Electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties' nominees. Some state laws provide that so-called "faithless Electors" may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under the Constitution. No Elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged. Today, it is rare for Electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for someone other than their party's candidate. Electors generally hold a leadership position in their party or were chosen to recognize years of loyal service to the party. Throughout our history as a nation, more than 99 percent of Electors have voted as pledged. Link to comment
datzenmike Posted October 19, 2016 Report Share Posted October 19, 2016 Nope, they will mysteriously die....like many have recently... Link to comment
datzenmike Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Who selects the Electors? Choosing each state's Electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each state choose slates of potential Electors sometime before the general election. Second, on Election Day, the voters in each state select their state's Electors by casting their ballots for President. The first part of the process is controlled by the political parties in each state and varies from state to state. Generally, the parties either nominate slates of potential Electors at their state party conventions or they chose them by a vote of the party's central committee. This happens in each state for each party by whatever rules the state party and (sometimes) the national party have for the process. This first part of the process results in each Presidential candidate having their own unique slate of potential Electors. Political parties often choose Electors for the slate to recognize their service and dedication to that political party. They may be state elected officials, state party leaders, or people in the state who have a personal or political affiliation with their party's Presidential candidate. (For specific information about how slates of potential Electors are chosen, contact the political parties in each state.) The second part of the process happens on Election Day. When the voters in each state cast votes for the Presidential candidate of their choice they are voting to select their state's Electors. The potential Electors' names may or may not appear on the ballot below the name of the Presidential candidates, depending on election procedures and ballot formats in each state. The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential Electors are appointed as the state's Electors—except in Nebraska and Maine, which have proportional distribution of the Electors. In Nebraska and Maine, the state winner receives two Electors and the winner of each congressional district (who may be the same as the overall winner or a different candidate) receives one Elector. This system permits the Electors from Nebraska and Maine to be awarded to more than one candidate. Are there restrictions on who the Electors can vote for? There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. Some states, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—Electors bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that Electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties' nominees. Some state laws provide that so-called "faithless Electors" may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under the Constitution. No Elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged. Today, it is rare for Electors to disregard the popular vote by casting their electoral vote for someone other than their party's candidate. Electors generally hold a leadership position in their party or were chosen to recognize years of loyal service to the party. Throughout our history as a nation, more than 99 percent of Electors have voted as pledged. So how do you know who the elector votes for? 2 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Nice try but should be more to the right. You wouldn't see the tail lights at that angle. Link to comment
Mattndew76 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 So how do you know who the elector votes for? This is made public. They are able to cast a personal vote in the popular ballot (Private) but also cast a vote in the college. This is what is counted on the map the election occurs. In Oregon the state gives all 7 electorate votes to the Democrat candidate regardless of party outcome in each district. They are all Stalwart Democrats Loyalists appointed by established state and federal representatives. The citizenry has no say in who is assigned to be part of our Electoral College. Only the established entrenched politicians have the say in who gets the "Honored" positions. I am not sure how each state works but this is how the Soviet Republic of Oregon works. Example: Link to comment
Ratwagon1600 Posted October 20, 2016 Author Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 The TV debate is just about to be shown. RW has the day off and is working in the Garage on a Secret project ;) I have a TV in the garage so will be watching/listening with morbid curiosity. The Trumpinator is apparently going to wheel out another crack whore WJC allegedly molested when he was a Governor. 2 Link to comment
john510 Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 This is made public. They are able to cast a personal vote in the popular ballot (Private) but also cast a vote in the college. This is what is counted on the map the election occurs. In Oregon the state gives all 7 electorate votes to the Democrat candidate regardless of party outcome in each district. They are all Stalwart Democrats Loyalists appointed by established state and federal representatives. The citizenry has no say in who is assigned to be part of our Electoral College. Only the established entrenched politicians have the say in who gets the "Honored" positions. I am not sure how each state works but this is how the Soviet Republic of Oregon works. Example: After seeing this map of electoral votes i dont think its fair that 5 states pretty much get to decide on how to fuck the whole country. Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 There she goes....russians fault LOL 2 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 This shit is gettn good now hahaha 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 4 minutes between the order and launch of nukes stated by Hillary.....uhm.....sensitive information anyone? Isn't this info suppossed to be top secret ???? 1 Link to comment
125 CSL Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Donald has missed chances to seal the deal. 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Yes he did, he had her cornered few times and backed off......dafuq Link to comment
tr8er Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Dick did about the same from 1960-68 and won but when the reporters eventually found dirt on him it was like a 1000 starving dingoes jumping on a chubby baby in a bacon onesie with a diaper full of Milk Bones so yeah it wasn't/isn't the best long-term strategy :thumbup: :rofl:! the thing is, the press always hated Nixon but always loved left-leaning Trump. if Donald didn't have ice water for plasma he probably would have had a nervous breakdown over the way the 4th Estate kicked him in the Christmas ornaments for Hillary. There's a reason Trump calls them assholes,they are.The media should not be helping anybody get elected,especially by using fiction or even lies with their reporting.Watch an hour or two of CNN or visit the Yahoo news page.All unfair and unbalanced.Trump is beat up daily yet Clinton's scandals get absolutely no coverage when they should ! Clinton's BS happened while she was in a position of power (government) Trumps faults occurred as a regular citizen.The media is a propaganda machine and a lot of the big players support,guess who ? Oh I hate the media. But they will be biased because they are a business in America. Americans are polarized and not working together on anything. Balanced reporting loses viewers. Trump chooses to alienate the press to try to neutralize the damage of all the really juicy crap he's shitted out in his wake over the years. In return he is not favored by press. I'm just saying its deserved. I hate salespeople and marketers. Media is just that. http://youtu.be/HUd6ARKcPS0 1 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted October 20, 2016 Report Share Posted October 20, 2016 Oh I hate the media. But they will be biased because they are a business in America. Americans are polarized and not working together on anything. Balanced reporting loses viewers. Trump chooses to alienate the press to try to neutralize the damage of all the really juicy crap he's shitted out in his wake over the years. In return he is not favored by press. I'm just saying its deserved. I hate salespeople and marketers. Media is just that. http://youtu.be/HUd6ARKcPS0 In other words, sheeps will believe alegations and deny facts, spoken like a true democrat. Link to comment
Recommended Posts