Cosmonaut Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 I wrote out this lengthy explanation of the life of a quadriplegic....but I decided to just put this up and smh. 3 Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted July 7, 2017 Report Share Posted July 7, 2017 You have stated your opinion more than once about this, we get what you are saying already. You think it is ridiculous and useless.. He did what he wanted to his car to enjoy riding in it, that is not ridiculous or useless, that is being creative The thing you and a quadriplegic have in common is, a quadriplegic is physically unable to wipe his ass, you can't because you usually have your head up yours Just an opinion 2 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 You think it is ridiculous and useless.. He did what he wanted to his car to enjoy riding in it, that is not ridiculous or useless, that is being creative C'mon Rick ridiculous/useless and creative are not mutually exclusive. It's easier to create something ridiculous/useless than it's opposite. I'm saying that there are only so many ways to get something right and an infinite number of ways to get it wrong. Now if this was a conveyance to allow him to go grocery shopping, he could be loaded and unloaded easily and still have his chair. But you are no better off than the tire iron in the trunk. If going out for a cruise to 'enjoy his car' it's missed the mark terribly. Hell, the groceries in the back seat would have more fun. If he was truly creative, he would have had some way to sit in the front so he could instruct the driver to 'go faster'. Would you sit in the trunk, when for less trouble and more enjoyment, you could sit in the front? You seem bitter, so yeah, maybe you wouldn't Not the same car. Link to comment
VFR800 Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 Not the same car. Did you just assume manufacturer? :devil: 3 Link to comment
Rick-rat Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 C'mon Rick ridiculous/useless and creative are not mutually exclusive. It's easier to create something ridiculous/useless than it's opposite. I'm saying that there are only so many ways to get something right and an infinite number of ways to get it wrong. Now if this was a conveyance to allow him to go grocery shopping, he could be loaded and unloaded easily and still have his chair. But you are no better off than the tire iron in the trunk. If going out for a cruise to 'enjoy his car' it's missed the mark terribly. Hell, the groceries in the back seat would have more fun. If he was truly creative, he would have had some way to sit in the front so he could instruct the driver to 'go faster'. Would you sit in the trunk, when for less trouble and more enjoyment, you could sit in the front? You seem bitter, so yeah, maybe you wouldn't That would be called function over form. Maybe if you have ever been immobilized you would have a clue. . 1 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 Did you just assume manufacturer? :devil: No those in the picture are Dodges the hacked up one is a Plymouth. C'mon Rick ridiculous/useless and creative are not mutually exclusive. It's easier to create something ridiculous/useless than it's opposite. I'm saying that there are only so many ways to get something right and an infinite number of ways to get it wrong. Now if this was a conveyance to allow him to go grocery shopping, he could be loaded and unloaded easily and still have his chair. But you are no better off than the tire iron in the trunk. If going out for a cruise to 'enjoy his car' it's missed the mark terribly. Hell, the groceries in the back seat would have more fun. If he was truly creative, he would have had some way to sit in the front so he could instruct the driver to 'go faster'. Would you sit in the trunk, when for less trouble and more enjoyment, you could sit in the front? You seem bitter, so yeah, maybe you wouldn't That would be called function over form. Maybe if you have ever been immobilized you would have a clue. . No, the superior function would be to be seated in the front. The superior form would be to not build a shed in the trunk. What does being immobilized have to do with this anyway? Are you saying an immobilized person deserves or has to settle for sitting in the trunk? Maybe the guy who built this thought so too. I'm saying this would have been far better if the passenger side was made accessible to him. 1 Link to comment
Rick-rat Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 As usual your opinion on what was done sucks. It is obvious that the owner did what he thought best for him. Even with a swivel seat, someone would have to wrestle him into the seat. Maybe he weighed 300 lbs. or more, pretty hard to move dead weight that heavy. You are repeating yourself over and over again, like you did with canby 2016 prices, and photbucket, let it go . You don't always need to have the last word on something, or do you? You are just a post whore that thinks he has to post on every subject in here, even when a subject has been answered by others, you need to add your cannuck 2 cents worth which is not worth 2 cents :rofl: 1 Link to comment
Cosmonaut Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 Would this be considered a "Post off"? 2 Link to comment
datzenmike Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 As usual your opinion on what was done sucks. It is obvious that the owner did what he thought best for him. Even with a swivel seat, someone would have to wrestle him into the seat. Maybe he weighed 300 lbs. or more, pretty hard to move dead weight that heavy. You are repeating yourself over and over again, like you did with canby 2016 prices, and photbucket, let it go . You don't always need to have the last word on something, or do you? You are just a post whore that thinks he has to post on every subject in here, even when a subject has been answered by others, you need to add your cannuck 2 cents worth which is not worth 2 cents :rofl: Well if someone lifted him into a wheel chair why not into the front seat? We don't have pennies or one or two dollar bills. Hey Rick I still have that bag of coins you gave me. Was going to get a lottery ticket. Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 Well if someone lifted him into a wheel chair why not into the front seat? We don't have pennies or one or two dollar bills. Hey Rick I still have that bag of coins you gave me. Was going to get a lottery ticket. We already covered why lifting isn't an option that can get you from point A to point B every time, come on Mike, you can do better, Rick the prick is kicking your ass now :lol: Link to comment
Jesse C. Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 We already covered why lifting isn't an option that can get you from point A to point B every time, come on Mike, you can do better, Rick the prick is kicking your ass now :lol: 2 Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted July 8, 2017 Report Share Posted July 8, 2017 :rofl: hahahahaha!!! Link to comment
Recommended Posts