nismo dr Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Crash test of '59 impala vs '09 malibu to show how far cars have come in 50 years. Head on 40mph http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xwYBBpHg1I Quote Link to comment
b210in Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 it's interesting that they did not show the drivers side of the malibu after the crash. from what is seen though, the malibu did better. Quote Link to comment
nismo dr Posted September 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 On autoblog.com they said the anaylsts said the malibu driver sustained a knee injury and bel air driver died on impact Quote Link to comment
mazdat Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 i think the malibu did a whole lot better than the impala, you would think that the impala will do better, if you pay close attention, the dash board on the impala caved in and on the malibu's, it barely moved if anything, something else:confused: Quote Link to comment
Icehouse Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 On autoblog.com they said the anaylsts said the malibu driver sustained a knee injury and bel air driver died on impact If the bel air driver had been drinking he would have lived and the other driver would have died :D Quote Link to comment
intense 620 Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 i cant believe they purposly crashed a vintage impala!!:lol: Quote Link to comment
Icehouse Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 I want to see a 510 vs. an H2 hahahaha Quote Link to comment
DISLEXICDIME Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 you should see the starion head on crash test's they are crazy the car is so stif it barley smash's Quote Link to comment
nukeday Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 That is really astounding. I don't think I fully appreciated the advances that have been made. The shot from inside the Malibu is very convincing. Any angle on the Impala is absolutely frightening. Makes me rethink relinquishing the Saab in favor of the B210... Quote Link to comment
fastdadd Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 i cant believe they purposely crashed a vintage impala!!:lol: i agree with you there...they could have given it to me instead Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Have to admit that if the '59 had air bags and a seat belt it still wouldn't be good. The '09 has hardly any interior 'damage', the doors stayed closed, windshield stayed in and only cracked and roof stayed in place and did not collapse. How'd the fuzzy dice make out? Quote Link to comment
Guest DatsuNoob Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 i cant believe they purposly crashed a vintage impala!!:lol: That was painful to watch. I've dreamed of owning a '59 since before I could drive. Quote Link to comment
HRH Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) For me, it's just proof the GM built shit from day one. Haven't found a 510 yet, but here's a 411 crash test. I think it would have faired much better than the '59. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKuIXeF8cqA Watch past the first one, the first isn't full speed. The cabin area is much more intact, and most of the loose stuff flying around, including the dummy, could be easily solved with shoulder belts, which Nissan did start using, since my 510 has them, though not in the back. But if you look where it hits, the worst deflection in the 411 is the steering column. Not good, but everything else stays put though the seat moves. If a driver were there it wouldn't have moved as much. Edited September 29, 2009 by HRH Quote Link to comment
Moisabamf Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 That is really astounding. I don't think I fully appreciated the advances that have been made. The shot from inside the Malibu is very convincing. Any angle on the Impala is absolutely frightening. Makes me rethink relinquishing the Saab in favor of the B210... yeah but the dont tell you anything about those enormous rust clouds that billow out of the bel air so rusted old bel air vs. brand new car, who will win?:confused: Quote Link to comment
blue72 Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 The engineers who crashed it say that the cloud wasn't rust, but built up grime that's impossible to clean with normal washes. They inspected the frame and structure beforehand to find it sound. Also, it was a straight 6 equipped car if that makes any of you feel better. Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) I wonder if a 348/409 equipped one would have hit that '09 harder? :D Edited September 29, 2009 by datzenmike Quote Link to comment
intense 620 Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 sound maybe but what makes anyone think a 50 year old car would stand up to one built a year ago? it doesnt matter what manufacturer made it, there is no way to be sure if the owner(s) kept it maintained 100% of the time or if the car in that crash test was refurbished. I say it was unfair and a horrible waste of a beautiful car!! Quote Link to comment
xlr8r Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 i cant believe they purposly crashed a vintage impala!!:lol: I don't dare send the link to my Dad that owns a 59 Impala that is in great original condition. He's having to sell off some of his toys, but the Impala will be the last to go if it reaches that point. Quote Link to comment
MAG58 Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Hmm... I bet it did better than my mini would have! I always tell the people that ride with me I drive fast because I don't want to feel it ;) Quote Link to comment
bonvo Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 yeah but the dont tell you anything about those enormous rust clouds that billow out of the bel airso rusted old bel air vs. brand new car, who will win?:confused: i was wondering when this would come up i call bullshit on the gm engineers saying it was sound grime comes off they have media blasting they have many ways to not only take it off but take it off quickly and as has been stated 50 somthing year old car vs brand new with no rust this is why my 56 chevy will get all new steal in the floors and possibly a new frame Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.