athoose Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 The stock exhaust system, 73 620 L-16, is not a 4-2-1 it Quote Link to comment
banzai510(hainz) Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 dont worry about it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!dont make this hard on yourself Quote Link to comment
RacnJsn95 Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Not sure about gains, losses, etc, but the way I built my y-pipe was just so I could make the merge easy, seeing as I had limited tools at the time. I've always read a 4-1 is better for low end torque, and a 4-2-1 is better for top end, but I highly doubt you'll notice a diff either way. Quote Link to comment
Pacific coast Datsun Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 It's an L 16..not gonna notice any difference. Other than sound.meaning muffler choice & or size of the pipe. Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 The '78 and up L20B (maybe all?) are basically cylinder #1 joining #2 and #3 which seem to join together just after leaving the head, and #4 coming in from the back to make one big single pipe. Quote Link to comment
fiveNdime Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 Yeah, I think performance isnt going to be a major deal, but I would stick with trying to get more bottom end which you need all you can get with a 16. I wouldn't go much more then 2.5" pipe and keep some back pressure. Quote Link to comment
agentalpha Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 (edited) I've always read a 4-1 is better for low end torque, and a 4-2-1 is better for top end, but I highly doubt you'll notice a diff either way. Actually, ya have it switched. And I wish people would quit saying "Backpressure". You NEVER want "Backpressure", and it's a BS ignorant term anyways. I HATE that frigging word. Almost as much as "upscale". What you want is to keep your exhaust temperatures hot, thereby velocity up. If the gasses are allowed to expand, they cool, and slow down, basically clogging your pipes, as the engine has to work extra hard to pump them out. Edited January 12, 2009 by agentalpha Quote Link to comment
ggzilla Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 (edited) Yes, agreed, fast flow is what is important. But if you make the pipe too big that slows down. Exhaust piping needs to be the "right" size, not just "bigger is better". As to 4-2-1, tri-Y or equal length, etc. -- Sure it'll make a performance difference. Instead of 125 HP, you could be getting -- just by rearranging the header pipes -- oh say 126 HP. You decide if it's worth that. Many racers feel it is, difference between winning or losing by a hair. Edited January 12, 2009 by ggzilla Quote Link to comment
athoose Posted January 12, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 So it sounds like minimal difference on this application. Though, one horse here and there on 70 hp motor is large. :) I need new exhaust otherwise I wouldn Quote Link to comment
fiveNdime Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Actually, ya have it switched. And I wish people would quit saying "Backpressure". You NEVER want "Backpressure", and it's a BS ignorant term anyways. I HATE that frigging word. Almost as much as "upscale". What you want is to keep your exhaust temperatures hot, thereby velocity up. If the gasses are allowed to expand, they cool, and slow down, basically clogging your pipes, as the engine has to work extra hard to pump them out. Backpressure:fu: Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.