Jump to content

INSMNCS: John Cain


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • flatcat19

    1594

  • VFR800

    1464

  • KoHeartsGPA

    1342

  • datzenmike

    1228

Top Posters In This Topic

Wrong.

 

While terrorists might practice guerrilla tactics. A guerrilla is not in any way a terrorist. A guerrilla is part of a small mobile force opposing another larger, usually superior, force using hit and run tactics choosing the time and place to their advantage.  The aim is to wear down and exhaust the enemy and force him to expend more men and equipment to cover every eventuality of attack rather than one decisive battle they would win. In this the guerrilla has the upper hand. Being mobile and small they attack weak spots and retreat when the enemy advances and harass when he retreats. Attacking the general populace is almost always counter productive to the guerrilla.

 

A terrorist is one who indiscriminately terrorizes the populace outside of the military. U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: “Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.”

 

Fuck off, you never lived in South America nor Africa, guerrillas terrorize and kill anyone who opposes them, the are terrorists.sir.

Link to comment

Fuck off, you never lived in South America nor Africa, guerrillas terrorize and kill anyone who opposes them, the are terrorists.sir.

 

Fuck off???

 

 

You mean Gorillas. :lol:

 

When guerrillas start slaughtering civilians to induce terror they become terrorists. No matter how noble just or correct the cause a guerrilla fights for, once he commits a terrorist act he takes on all the negative connotations of the word terrorist.  Worse he looses any support for his cause by the populace.

 

U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: “Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.”....... I didn't make this up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Z TRAIN

 

Z TRAIN

 

Z TRAIN

 

 

JOHN510

 

JOHN510

 

JOHN510

 

PARADIME

 

PARADIME
 

PARADIME

 

 

 

 

great, more political BS in insomniacs

 

 

 

I guess you have to live in a country where guerrillas terrorize people in order for you guys to understand.

 

How are you not understanding this?



Oh wait...no #fml allowed.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

 

 

 

great, more political BS in insomniacs

 

 

Did you hear they are trying to take the red hats out of christmas??

 

 

5286684090_879096ea5b_z.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No??  Well then,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, DANCE!!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Oh, I understand, I just don't accept the definition defined by the definite definition of the definition.

 

:)

 

A guerrilla can become a terrorist but not the other way round. Once a terrorist always a terrorist. You can't un-ring that bell.

 

I understand Fuck off...... as in

 

 

 

Fuck off, you never lived in South America nor Africa, guerrillas terrorize and kill anyone who opposes them, the are terrorists.sir.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.