Guest Rick-rat Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 When he says " N/A" he means he doesn't have a Datsun :thumbup: :crying: 1 Quote Link to comment
OneFastRat Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Lol maybe I will soon. I got a job and might be able to secure another one next week. Time to start saving. Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 bravo rick, bravo Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Of course, lag is no longer an issue, with anything done the right way, but whatever, I was just curious. Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 ^^ I wasn't even going to get that technical with it, hee jus ignant Quote Link to comment
OneFastRat Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Wouldn't say ignorant, more like inexperienced Quote Link to comment
datsunfreak Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Wouldn't say ignorant, more like inexperienced That kinda what ignorant means... ^_^ 1 Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Wouldn't say ignorant, more like inexperienced The big key to learning is being truly okay with that. Over the years, I have found that many times, I have gotten my mind made up on a particular topic, only to find out I was dead wrong later on. I have noticed a very strong trend in older guys (my age and above) that have a really hard time with admitting they are wrong about something and speak with such conviction on things that they really know very little about, even when they saw the opposite of what they thought to be a fact proven wrong right in front of their own eyes. These guys are stuck and will never learn anything, because they already know everything. Admitting your inexperience is a good thing. This concludes our heartfelt after school special, now ffffffffffffuck off. :rofl: 3 Quote Link to comment
Cleopatra Jones Posted March 15, 2014 Report Share Posted March 15, 2014 Checker Marathon 4 Quote Link to comment
Dattokai Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Then I ate a fortune cookie.. 2 Quote Link to comment
heretic Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Sacramento, CA 1 Quote Link to comment
TENDRIL Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 have no idea what this is, Right hand drive, only markings GTB,and i believe 503 or 523 on the badge 2 Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 looks like a 69 charger to me Quote Link to comment
datrod Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Old ass ford cab over. 2 Quote Link to comment
datrod Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 looks like a 69 charger to me Same here. Quote Link to comment
'70dime Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Boom in referance to the charger posted above http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/0903phr_13_different_muscle_cars_of_sema/1969_dodge_charger_vehicle_specifications.html 1 Quote Link to comment
TENDRIL Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 yup that is it!! Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 only in a muscle car can you replace the steel trim pieces with aluminium in the interior and lighten it 500lbs :lol: 1 Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 Ya know, we all consider these old muscle cars to really be heavy boats, because they have a lot of steel and when you drive them, they feel heavy, but the funny thing is, they really are not that crazy heavy. Like the charger, the old one (440 version) is like 500 pounds less than the new one. There are a lot of goodies on new cars that really add up in weight. Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 right there with you smoke, new cars are mostly fat and bloated 1 Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 But, I bet if a guy went to yanking parts off of a newer one to make a race car, it would be pretty darn light (I think). If I remember correctly, Ford got that big ass Thunderbolt down to like 3200 and change with the 427 fe in it. I recall one of the big three had acid dipped their body for a trans-am race and made it so thin they were hoping no one leaned on it. Lots of folks don't pay much attention to power to weight ratio, they just throw out big horsepower numbers. Like, the 428 in my Ford truck, it has a 481 horsepower (at the crank), but, it rubs 7000 pounds with me sitting in it, it's no rocket ship. It's why I have always dug the old, standard VW bug. In full dress, they were like 1600 pounds, with most of the weight right over the rear wheels. It's why a lot of people wonder why they just got their ass handed to them by a bug that only has 200 hp. That would be 8 pounds for every one hp. A car like the charger is going to have to be a "TRUE" 500 hp car to pull around it. Not the 500 hp that everyone claims to have, but a real 500. Actually, I think claiming 500 hp died out in the early 90s, now everyone with a smallblock and a chrome air cleaner is 800 hp. 2 Quote Link to comment
datrod Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 I think claiming 500 hp died out in the early 90s, now everyone with a smallblock and a chrome air cleaner is 800 hp. There is a guy here in town with a nice little 63 Nova. He claims 450 out of a small block. I've asked him a number of times if he has ever run it on a dyno. No I haven't. Well then how do you know it has 450??? :rofl: Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 He probably just thought no one would even question such a small number these days. My own Father was pulling that shit for a while. He bought a hotrod from a guy, that told dad it was 600 hp, so Dad kept parroting it to people. I told him that he was going to say that to the wrong guy one day and embarrass us both. Then, I went too far and told him if it actually broke past 300 at the wheels on a dyno I would pass out in disbelief. He didn't speak to me for a while, but at least he stopped doing it (in front of me). Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted March 17, 2014 Report Share Posted March 17, 2014 I agree with you that there is a ton (literally) of extra practically unneeded crap on a car now a days. and the new muscle cars ate putting down some serious numbers, even the v6 in the camaro puts out just over 300bhp. I would be curious to see what a stripped down new car would weigh in at Quote Link to comment
smoke Posted March 18, 2014 Report Share Posted March 18, 2014 It rubs me a little wrong to say this, but new shit fuckin hauls when compared to your average muscle car from yesteryear. Most of the stuff old dudes like me considered fast (when stock) were in reality high 14, low 15 second cars. Such as the Mustang GT 390, 1970 454 Chevelle, 396 SS camaro and so on. These days, your average mini cooper does that. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.