mellotrongirl Posted September 10, 2010 Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 Simple question that may provoke some detailed replies...what is the preferred year for the Fairlady? What year was the peak year for performance, style, reliability, etc.? I equate this to the Triumph TR-6 sports car. In the six or so years they were available, it appeared that the most collectable and preferred year was 1973. That was the year the engine was modified, and the frame and suspension upgraded. Also, is there one year or subclassification/model that is super rare? And what is the most common? Quote Link to comment
FoxyRoadster Posted September 10, 2010 Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 well the 67.5 is the rarest but as for the most common that is a hard call. I'd say they all was super reliable it just depends on what you want with the car for the low windshield you'd go with a pre 68 model if you wanted a taller windshield then 68-70, the pre 68's had a flat dash as the post 68's had a padded vinyl dash. http://datsun.org/ has pretty extensive info on changes per year to year. I'd say with the roadster crowd it just depends on the person on which year that they want as some are happy with stock drum brakes all around or some want disc. Quote Link to comment
exit64 Posted September 10, 2010 Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 Hey Mello, Look at 311s.org and you will get everything you ever wanted to know and more about the Lady's! A 67.5 2000 is the holy grail. There is a real nice 69 2000 for sale in The Dalles right now for 4K. If I wasn't already working on my 2000, this one would already be in my driveway. 68-70's have the taller wind shields and also have a better steering box set up. The low windshield cars have the flat dashes with cooler gauges. I like the side markers on the 69's and will set up my SR car with those. It is all just personal preference for the most part. Quote Link to comment
FoxyRoadster Posted September 10, 2010 Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 http://seattle.craigslist.org/skc/cto/1934605781.html heres a project for a killer price Quote Link to comment
mellotrongirl Posted September 10, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 The one in The Dalles is a beaut! And the Seattle find I'm sure someone will give it a second life in no time. Both will probably go by the end of the weekend! And I'll be going through The Dalles next week, but am at the mercy of carpooling... Thanks for the input & links...curious for now--got to get a '71 521 running, a converted '79 620 EV back home and a '78 longbed upgraded before I think of another ride I'm afraid... Quote Link to comment
FoxyRoadster Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 well roadsters are a little more pricey on things then most datsuns, 510s are much cheaper overall.. *shudders* 1000 dollars for the ball joints. Quote Link to comment
BvtnDave Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 No right answer to this one, but the love for the '67 2000 seems to be the most common I have heard. For my money, (which is more than I care to think about having poured into the two Roadsters on hand) there are two winners: The 1968 1600, because the high windshield and padded dash got the car out of it's dated "Britishness". Also because the 1600's exhibit what I feel is a very good balance of handling/ride/braking in relation to the amount of (stock) power on hand. 96 HP just feels right with the stock suspension, tires and brakes. Then too, the 1969 2000 is the "it" car for me because of the much greater power and the super-cool side-marker lamps. (I like those so much, I put a set on my "68 1600, which had no side lamps). I know: the rectangular side-markers on the '70 cars were the same as many other Datsuns of that day. They just look "clunky" to me... One final note: I have many times remarked that I believe one reason so many Roadsters met an early demise was because they were so sweet-running and reliable. People just drove the hell out of them and they slowly reached a state where the cost of repairs outweighed the idea of reviving them. Then too, I'm betting quite a few 2000's were crashed because they had more power than the suspension and brakes (see above opinion) could handle without a really good driver at the wheel. Again, just my ideas. I am lucky enough to have a stock 1600 and am restoring a 2000, so we'll see if my theories hold up in the long run... Quote Link to comment
vindats1 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 No right answer to this one, but the love for the '67 2000 seems to be the most common I have heard. For my money, (which is more than I care to think about having poured into the two Roadsters on hand) there are two winners: The 1968 1600, because the high windshield and padded dash got the car out of it's dated "Britishness". Also because the 1600's exhibit what I feel is a very good balance of handling/ride/braking in relation to the amount of (stock) power on hand. 96 HP just feels right with the stock suspension, tires and brakes. Then too, the 1969 2000 is the "it" car for me because of the much greater power and the super-cool side-marker lamps. (I like those so much, I put a set on my "68 1600, which had no side lamps). I know: the rectangular side-markers on the '70 cars were the same as many other Datsuns of that day. They just look "clunky" to me... One final note: I have many times remarked that I believe one reason so many Roadsters met an early demise was because they were so sweet-running and reliable. People just drove the hell out of them and they slowly reached a state where the cost of repairs outweighed the idea of reviving them. Then too, I'm betting quite a few 2000's were crashed because they had more power than the suspension and brakes (see above opinion) could handle without a really good driver at the wheel. Again, just my ideas. I am lucky enough to have a stock 1600 and am restoring a 2000, so we'll see if my theories hold up in the long run... Quote Link to comment
vindats1 Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 That would be tough to decide on one year. Mine is a very nice 1968 1600, but I guess I like all of them. the 1600 has plenty of power for me too. Corners well and good acceleration. I love looking at all of them. Quote Link to comment
Guest DatsuNoob Posted November 1, 2010 Report Share Posted November 1, 2010 Low windshield F.T.W. !!! Damn government D.O.T. safety lovin oppressors! lolz Quote Link to comment
BunnySlippers Posted November 12, 2010 Report Share Posted November 12, 2010 I'll let you know how I like the 65's when I get one of mine on the road. Quote Link to comment
fisch Posted November 12, 2010 Report Share Posted November 12, 2010 I love the pre 68 dash with the toggle switches! Quote Link to comment
FoxyRoadster Posted November 12, 2010 Report Share Posted November 12, 2010 I love the pre 68 dash with the toggle switches! yeah it makes it feel like a race car! I'm replacing my DOT dash for a home made flat dash I plan to get some toggle switches on it and such. Plus having it woodgrain is classy! Quote Link to comment
Daeron Posted November 14, 2010 Report Share Posted November 14, 2010 My uncle owned Roadsters all over the map, and he always had a pretty soft spot for the '70 2000s. They were made side by side with the Z-cars, he would say, they had slightly more modern tech in their headlight and high amperage wiring (I think there was a relay difference or something) They used the side markers and door handles like the Z so they are more readily available nowadays... But there is no ONE "year to get" a Fair Lady. Each model,in each year, was it's own little girl, and you have to decide which one you want. Low windshields and flat panel dashboards get my engine revving, but so does that under-engineered OHC 2 liter, so 67.5 2000 is my kinda beast, but those are as rare as dragon droppings these days so it isn't like I'm going to turn my head from the 67 1600 or the 69 2000 in the garage.... Quote Link to comment
datsun 521 ute Posted December 12, 2010 Report Share Posted December 12, 2010 I would have to say the rarest would have to be the 1958 S211 with only 20 made http://www.earlydatsun.com/datsuns211.html The most powerful would be the SR311 with the 150hp U20 engine My favourite would have to be the 63-64 SP310, I have owned 4 of these and still own my first one. http://www.ozdat.com/forum/download/file.php?id=16502&mode=view Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.