Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • datzenmike

    3450

  • john510

    1466

  • Mattndew76

    1041

  • paradime

    886

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

10 hours ago, frankendat said:

That makes me mad. Mad that Idaho was third on the list of banned States. I would like the details on how the ranking, did the first and second on the list receive "insider" information? Unfortunately, it could be the invasion of progressives, mucking up the political gears. Hopefully, Idaho will do better in the next California rating.

Why sad Ranman72?

Link to comment

FBI honeypot phones are now public—and showing up on the secondary market.

 

Last month, authorities disclosed that the FBI and Australian Federal Police secretly operated an "encrypted device company" called "Anom." The company sold 12,000 smartphones to criminal syndicates around the world. These were pitched as secure devices but were actually honeypot devices that routed all messages to an FBI-owned server. The disclosure was light on details, but now that it's public, Anom phones are being unloaded on the secondary market. That means us normal people are finally getting a look at them, starting with this Vice article detailing one of the devices.

 

The FBI has basically weaponized what the Android modding community has been doing for years. Some Android phones have unlockable bootloaders, which let you wipe out the original operating system and replace it with your own build of an OS, called a custom ROM. The Anom device Vice got was a Google Pixel 4a, one of the most developer-friendly devices out there. The FBI's custom ROM shows an "ArcaneOS" boot screen, and it replaced the normal Google Android distribution with the FBI's skin of Android 10.

 

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/07/how-the-fbi-weaponized-android-modding-with-anom-devices/

Link to comment

I want one so the FBI can die of boredom following me.

 

Which begs the question, why go public about this? Maybe they have something better going on. Can a phone capture another nearby phone secretly and take it over???? I don't have a clue about phones but could selling these to criminals allow all of their other devices to be hacked and brought under FBI control without their knowledge???

Link to comment
20 hours ago, Ranman72 said:

sad because people still discriminate against gay people 

I'm confused. My comment was in reference to California's stance on transgender athletes, specifically, "Representatives of the state of California won’t be traveling to West Virginia with taxpayer funds as a result of the legislature’s ban on young transgender-athletes playing sports." I am not in favor of discrimination based on sexual preference, but am concerned of the manipulation of children and usually err on the side of parental rights, over State intervention.

 

Substitute teach at your local junior high or high school, to be reminded of the general ignorance of children. Yes, I am sure you know many smart children, there are even "genius" children, but they are genius in certain settings and still ignorant in many others. We as a society recognize this as fact. Before the eighteenth birthday, purchasing cigarettes is illegal, because it is thought those younger will not fully comprehend the life long dangers associated with tobacco. Before the eighteenth birthday, a number of serious crimes receive reduced sentences, because it is thought those younger did not fully comprehend the life long implications. The military will allow entry a seventeen with parental consent, so I wouldn't oppose such a rule for seventeen year olds that had graduated or dropped out of high school. There are many other legal protections afforded, and denied those under the age of eighteen, because it is realized they are ignorant.

I fully support State intervention and/or prosecution of anyone providing sexual reassignment surgery, hormones, or the like, that impair or promote growth in opposition of biological sex. I know, before someone cries for those born intersexed, I am sure, like the military seventeen with parental consent issue, for those very rare instances, exceptions could be made.

Now, how children, walk, talk, dress, etc. those are the battles that parents must fight. Unless extreme, the State should stay out of it. Lord knows my parents and I fought. I wanted to wear leather studded accessories like Judas Priest. My Dad said it made me look like a homosexual. What! I was up in arms, how dare he say that! I grew out of it, the leather not the Priest and am glad my father didn't read Hit Parader, so he didn't know when Halford "came out". When I say "Kids are ignorant" I am not excusing myself.

 

I focused this response on transgender and children, because that is the root of the transgender athlete ban. I support the right of adults to mutilate themselves in any manner they deem fit. Whether or not this is "fair" in certain adult sporting events....statistically, more women are democrats and democrats are the ones pushing these issues, so I say go for it. End all woman and man sports and create single all inclusive teams, based solely on merit. I would love to see how that works out.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
4 hours ago, frankendat said:

I'm confused. My comment was in reference to California's stance on transgender athletes, specifically, "Representatives of the state of California won’t be traveling to West Virginia with taxpayer funds as a result of the legislature’s ban on young transgender-athletes playing sports." I am not in favor of discrimination based on sexual preference, but am concerned of the manipulation of children and usually err on the side of parental rights, over State intervention.

 

Substitute teach at your local junior high or high school, to be reminded of the general ignorance of children. Yes, I am sure you know many smart children, there are even "genius" children, but they are genius in certain settings and still ignorant in many others. We as a society recognize this as fact. Before the eighteenth birthday, purchasing cigarettes is illegal, because it is thought those younger will not fully comprehend the life long dangers associated with tobacco. Before the eighteenth birthday, a number of serious crimes receive reduced sentences, because it is thought those younger did not fully comprehend the life long implications. The military will allow entry a seventeen with parental consent, so I wouldn't oppose such a rule for seventeen year olds that had graduated or dropped out of high school. There are many other legal protections afforded, and denied those under the age of eighteen, because it is realized they are ignorant.

I fully support State intervention and/or prosecution of anyone providing sexual reassignment surgery, hormones, or the like, that impair or promote growth in opposition of biological sex. I know, before someone cries for those born intersexed, I am sure, like the military seventeen with parental consent issue, for those very rare instances, exceptions could be made.

Now, how children, walk, talk, dress, etc. those are the battles that parents must fight. Unless extreme, the State should stay out of it. Lord knows my parents and I fought. I wanted to wear leather studded accessories like Judas Priest. My Dad said it made me look like a homosexual. What! I was up in arms, how dare he say that! I grew out of it, the leather not the Priest and am glad my father didn't read Hit Parader, so he didn't know when Halford "came out". When I say "Kids are ignorant" I am not excusing myself.

 

I focused this response on transgender and children, because that is the root of the transgender athlete ban. I support the right of adults to mutilate themselves in any manner they deem fit. Whether or not this is "fair" in certain adult sporting events....statistically, more women are democrats and democrats are the ones pushing these issues, so I say go for it. End all woman and man sports and create single all inclusive teams, based solely on merit. I would love to see how that works out.

maybe i didnt read deep enough

I am for pro choice if you want to be a boy or a girl or both I dont care it is your choice 

as far as children they should not be allowed to change their born gender while their parents are still responsible for them IE 18 

however what if they are born with a penis and then grow boobs ( what do we do ) do bloodwork to determine gender ?

force them to live as a boy with boobs ? force them to live as a girl with a dick ?

I dont have the answers i was just (SAD) that people are still prejudice over gays in general 

Edited by Ranman72
  • Like 2
Link to comment
23 minutes ago, Ranman72 said:

maybe i didnt read deep enough

I am for pro choice if you want to be a boy or a girl or both I dont care it is your choice 

as far as children they should not be allowed to change their born gender while their parents are still responsible for them IE 18 

however what if they are born with a penis and then grow boobs ( what do we do ) do bloodwork to determine gender ?

force them to live as a boy with boobs ? force them to live as a girl with a dick ?

I dont have the answers i was just (SAD) that people are still prejudice over gays in general 

 

Some people are born with ambiguous genitalia, hermaphrodite. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
39 minutes ago, Racer X 69 said:

 

Some people are born with ambiguous genitalia, hermaphrodite. 

 

It is also insanely rare and in most they are only fertile as females. I mean we are literally talking hundreds of cases worldwide and 96% are in Africa. I consider this to be such an amazingly rare event as to be statistically insignificant for anything meaningful.

 

In reality it is mostly used as a talking point by people with an agenda.

 

 

From Wikipedia

The exact number of confirmed cases is uncertain, but by 1991 approximately 500 cases had been confirmed.[12]

It has also been estimated that more than 525 have been documented.[6]

96% of cases have been reported in Africa.[13]

Fertility

The gonad most likely to function is the ovary.[13] The ovotestes show evidence of ovulation in 50% of cases.[14] Spermatogenesis has only been observed in solitary testes and not in the testicular portions of ovotestes.[15][14] According to a 1994 study, spermatogenesis has only been proven in two cases.[16]

Spermatogenesis is never present in cases with XX.[13]

It has been estimated that 80% of cases could be fertile as females with the right surgeries.[6]

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Racer X 69 said:

 

Some people are born with ambiguous genitalia, hermaphrodite. 

Clerks! Magazine title "Best of both worlds. Hermaphraditic porn. Chicks with dicks! What a concept! These chicks have dicks that would put mine to shame!" Randal

Edited by bottomwatcher
Misquoting
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Kamala Harris is mocked for claiming rural residents can't get photocopies of their IDs to vote by mail because they don't have 'Kinkos or OfficeMax'

 

Imagine voting for the party which constantly tells you how ignorant and stupid you are 🤷‍♂️

Edited by thisismatt
Markup
  • Like 3
Link to comment
15 minutes ago, thisismatt said:

 

 

 

Imagine voting for the party which constantly tells you how ignorant and stupid you are..... and you just don't 'get it' because you are ignorant and stupid. 🤷‍♂️

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
11 hours ago, Ranman72 said:

maybe i didnt read deep enough

I am for pro choice if you want to be a boy or a girl or both I dont care it is your choice 

as far as children they should not be allowed to change their born gender while their parents are still responsible for them IE 18 

however what if they are born with a penis and then grow boobs ( what do we do ) do bloodwork to determine gender ?

force them to live as a boy with boobs ? force them to live as a girl with a dick ?

I dont have the answers i was just (SAD) that people are still prejudice over gays in general 

Is it really prejudice against gays or are people just sick and tired of the rhetoric ? The constant demands for equality,rights etc. The demands that we must accept and approve of it.In my opinion they have every right any American has.I don't care who's gay or not but i don't need anybody to advertise it to me and force me to approve of it.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.