destruction of america

[Mattndew76]

piss off.

 

Given your reading level I don't really give a fuck what you have to say. Go watch TV.

Edited December 3, 2020 by Mattndew76

[BrothersGarage]

3 minutes ago, Mattndew76 said:

piss off.

 

Given your reading level I don't really give a fuck what you have to say. Go watch TV.

My reading level? LOL 

[Mattndew76]

Yeah. You are stupid.

 

Its not a big mystery to anyone outside of yourself. 

 

The TV is more your speed.

[BrothersGarage]

5 minutes ago, Mattndew76 said:

Yeah. You are stupid.

 

Its not a big mystery to anyone outside of yourself. 

 

The TV is more your speed.

You attack my sources without addressing any of my points, but when I go though your sources you result to name calling. 

Grow up and a little advice: 

Edited December 3, 2020 by BrothersGarage

[Mattndew76]

No name calling. Just stating a fact by using your definition of a fact. 👍

Edited December 3, 2020 by Mattndew76

[BrothersGarage]

3 minutes ago, Mattndew76 said:

No name calling. Just stating a fact by using your definition of a fact. 👍

I am stupid because you're wrong? LOL sound like your kind of 'facts' you like living in that alternate reality you're stuck in. 

[Ooph!]

 

 

[BrothersGarage]

5 minutes ago, Ooph! said:

 

 

Good. If there is any further information that is credible, it 100% should be investigated. 

[datzenmike]

14 minutes ago, Ooph! said:

 

 

 

Incorrectly reported???? AKA bias.

 

 

7 minutes ago, BrothersGarage said:

Good. If there is any further information that is credible, it 100% should be investigated. 

 

5 hours ago, datzenmike said:

 

The media is notorious for taking shit out of context. I checked those links and not one shows Barr saying those words or in fact no video at all other than a still picture.

 

5 hours ago, datzenmike said:

 

Well do you trust the FBI???? then. Maybe he should keep looking or looking harder because apparently there are masses of people signing affidavits about the shit going on.  .

 

 

[Duncan]

This in a very interesting site.. The name should be somewhat of a clue..

 

https://hereistheevidence.com/

 

It does refer you to a number of sources and sites, so nothing is fool proof.  To me is does raise a lot of suspicions about election integrity..

 

Did the Russians not show up this election?  I've not heard them mentioned once, btw.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited December 3, 2020 by Duncan

[BrothersGarage]

1 minute ago, Duncan said:

This in a very interesting site.. The name should be somewhat of a clue..

 

https://hereistheevidence.com/

As I pointed out previously that site is hot garbage. Try going though the links for posts from 2014 about Toronto Canada having voting issues, links to breibart, peoples opinions in youtube videos, and things that have already been tossed out in court cases. For that page to be taken seriously it needs to be vetted and updated. 

[Duncan]

1 minute ago, BrothersGarage said:

As I pointed out previously that site is hot garbage. Try going though the links for posts from 2014 about Toronto Canada having voting issues, links to breibart, peoples opinions in youtube videos, and things that have already been tossed out in court cases. For that page to be taken seriously it needs to be vetted and updated. 

 

And I will point out the Ellen Page is now Elliot Page.  I think that is beautiful..

 

 

[Ooph!]

30 minutes ago, BrothersGarage said:

As I pointed out previously that site is hot garbage. Try going though the links for posts from 2014 about Toronto Canada having voting issues, links to breibart, peoples opinions in youtube videos, and things that have already been tossed out in court cases. For that page to be taken seriously it needs to be vetted and updated. 

 

So I just looked to see if I could discern if it was somewhat legit or a hot mess and I picked the 40K dead voters line. It takes you to another page that shows the list of voters that have matching obituaries.

At first glance it seems to be legit, if it's crap how do you come to that conclusion?

 

From the list it took me to ; https://hereistheevidence.com/fact-list/pa-009b20/ Then under fact #4 gives this link with the list of actual info where the voter is shown to match an existing obituary https://checkyourvote.org/deceased-voters/pennsylvania

Edited December 3, 2020 by Ooph!

[BrothersGarage]

1 hour ago, Ooph! said:

 

So I just looked to see if I could discern if it was somewhat legit or a hot mess and I picked the 40K dead voters line. It takes you to another page that shows the list of voters that have matching obituaries.

At first glance it seems to be legit, if it's crap how do you come to that conclusion?

 

From the list it took me to ; https://hereistheevidence.com/fact-list/pa-009b20/ Then under fact #4 gives this link with the list of actual info where the voter is shown to match an existing obituary https://checkyourvote.org/deceased-voters/pennsylvania

Then they definitely should look into that.

Problems I have with that though is none of the links on the check your vote work to any of the voter information on the left "screenshots" don't work, and just scrolling though it some of them have the same names but none ofthe other info matches up. Can't there be 2 people with the same name living in the same state? It's pretty easy to create a website that scrapes voting records for people over an age and then searches ancestry.com for corresponding info. 

Again - that should be totally looked into though. 

Here are more samples from that same website 'hereistheevidence' 

All the same dudes youtube video:

 

 

2 guys sign up 8,000 homless people signed up to vote - caught before the scheme worked and none of them were counted
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/pair-charged-with-voter-fraud-allegedly-submitted-thousands-of-fraudulent-applications-on-behalf-of-homeless-people/2464168/
 

A mathematician guessing at the improbability of republican mail in voters and the outcome of the votes in Pennsylvania

A link to a list of people over 100 that voted
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k9ZBKgSf3mBp0W6vd_PM6IF9usivD7iH_JPhATC7DIA/edit#gid=731307020

Some girls blog saying that her mom committed voter fraud by voting with her married and maiden name

A link to a guy saying his mother hasn't voted in 30 years and after she was put in a retirement home she registered and voted for a democrat, and the mother saying she didn't vote. 
https://www.inquirer.com/philly/news/vote-fraud-election-seniors-pennsylvania-20171103.html?__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar
 

a link to a twitter thread where every post the guy made was flagged for "disputed"

a link to a ruling where Pennsylvania mail in ballots can't be tossed out over discarded signature

 

a link to a tweet that is disputed about 3000 votes in Nevada

a link to Pennsylvania mail in ballot information provided by the state

a congressman's objections to vote counting in Georgia

Another 3 links to the same dudes youtube video I screenshot above

a link to a twitter thread where a senator is talking about asking for an independent audit of Michigan's votes

 

the same "oh look at all these dumped Biden votes" for Michigan graph that's been posted here a shitload of times. 

followed by the same link again. 

a post to the story about how the USPS had lost a shit ton of mail-in ballots (fuckin thanks DeJoy)

a link to a voter fraud website that breaks it down state by state. 

a link complaining about how Americans run elections. 

another twitter thread saying that there was a 95% voter turnout and that it just had to have a ton of dead voters in it...because that's the only way it's possible because the vote totals for Hillary and how there was no growth in the area means that Biden should have gotten fewer votes than Hillary did....what?

A fucking link from 1994
https://www.nytimes.com/1994/02/19/us/vote-fraud-ruling-shifts-pennsylvania-senate.html?smid=tw-share
 

Some dudes github

a link about how the special elections could decide a close election in clark county Nevada

a link to newsmax about the ballot rejection rates

 

a link to the US complaing that Ukraine election was ruined due to ejected observers

 

a link to a guys post about the mathematician above

 

another fucking youtube video where half of it shows the guys computer background with him and his girlfriend while he reads from websites. but it looks like he plays WoW and Starcraft 2, and team fortress so I guess he can't be all that bad.

a link to 2016
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/

a link to 2012
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html

 

fucking breibart

 

another website complaining about the US's response to Ukraine and how that somehow relates to 2020s election

 

a fucking link from 1977 about a news article from 19-fucking-48
https://www.nytimes.com/1977/07/31/archives/exofficial-says-he-stole-1948-election-for-johnson-most-involved.html?smid=tw-share

The list goes ON and fucking ON and fucking ON with 80+ percent of horseshit and has nothing to do with our current election. And that was just starting at the top and going down until I got bored with this comment chain.

Again - this old crap needs to be removed, and this stuff needs to be vetted,  before anyone should take this site serious. 

 

Edited December 3, 2020 by BrothersGarage

[Jesse C.]

 

[datzenmike]

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

This in a very interesting site.. The name should be somewhat of a clue..

 

https://hereistheevidence.com/

 

It does refer you to a number of sources and sites, so nothing is fool proof.  To me is does raise a lot of suspicions about election integrity..

 

Did the Russians not show up this election?  I've not heard them mentioned once, btw.

 

 

Now that's what I call patriotic. Even if a claim turns out to have no merit it should be vigorously be pursued and laid to rest one way or the other.

 

Russians? Maybe they never really showed up last time, in any meaningful way. Don't forget it was the media that hyped this.

[tr8er]

1 hour ago, datzenmike said:

 

Now that's what I call patriotic. Even if a claim turns out to have no merit it should be vigorously be pursued and laid to rest one way or the other.

 

Russians? Maybe they never really showed up last time, in any meaningful way. Don't forget it was the media that hyped this.

Except Gussifer 2.0 was traced back to a Russian IP proximate to a Russian intelligence facility.  
 

The play is to discredit all who do vigorously pursue these leads.  Who’s job it is to sort out, call out, and eliminate these false leads.  Throw out so many false claims that discrediting each one individually, satisfactorily would would be too boring to read.  People prefer to buy into the scandal.  And the protagonist of this story has run this plot line time and again.  
 

The American Yin vs the American Yang.  Finding common ground equates rally around a common enemy.  It’s no longer about wanting something, but rather wanting anything else.  
 

I spent some time looking up obituaries and looking at the list of registered voters.  Picked the oddest names I saw.  Found some same names in the same towns.  Realized pretty quickly that anyone looking to the same would tire of the process pretty quick.  Those who want to believe would believe.  Those who want to say BS, would say BS.  But neither would be able to confirm anything conclusive.  It’s designed to be shared.  To sew doubt.  I personally think the nation desperately needs to never elect anyone as divisive again.  

[Ooph!]

59 minutes ago, tr8er said:

 

 I personally think the nation desperately needs to never elect anyone as divisive again.  

 

Like President Obama?

[datzenmike]

7 hours ago, tr8er said:

Except Gussifer 2.0 was traced back to a Russian IP proximate to a Russian intelligence facility.  
 

The play is to discredit all who do vigorously pursue these leads.  Who’s job it is to sort out, call out, and eliminate these false leads.  Throw out so many false claims that discrediting each one individually, satisfactorily would would be too boring to read.  People prefer to buy into the scandal.  And the protagonist of this story has run this plot line time and again.  
 

The American Yin vs the American Yang.  Finding common ground equates rally around a common enemy.  It’s no longer about wanting something, but rather wanting anything else.  
 

I spent some time looking up obituaries and looking at the list of registered voters.  Picked the oddest names I saw.  Found some same names in the same towns.  Realized pretty quickly that anyone looking to the same would tire of the process pretty quick.  Those who want to believe would believe.  Those who want to say BS, would say BS.  But neither would be able to confirm anything conclusive.  It’s designed to be shared.  To sew doubt.  I personally think the nation desperately needs to never elect anyone as divisive again.  

 

It's pretty much a smorgasbord of 'facts,' claims, opinions and falsehood here too. I'm not going to wade through the mess. It all comes down to 'was there enough election shenanigans to say it was unfair'. I don't know how many constitutes a case but there are agencies that will wade through all the claims no matter how long it takes. Left 'up in the air' the American people will never trust the voting process again. So what does your constitution say about this?...

 

Is there a provision for calling a winner. What's the safety net for this situation?

 

 

[Jesse C.]

3 minutes ago, datzenmike said:

 

Is there a provision for calling a winner. What's the safety net for this situation?

 

 

 

[Jesse C.]

7 hours ago, tr8er said:

    I personally think the nation desperately needs to never elect anyone as divisive again.  

 

So, you are saying no more Democrats, right?  Because all of the divisive things I saw go down where perpetrated by Democrats, Liberals and Socialists. 

 

[datzenmike]

6 minutes ago, Jesse C. said:

 

 

I assume SCOTUS??? 

 

I'm seeing some fore planning with ACB and Cavanaugh

 

 

[Jesse C.]

And these are the types we have to deal with....

 

 

[Dguy210]

Video evidence of cheating in GA election, more than enough to change the results.

 

Includes ballot counters waiting until people leave and then pulling out boxes of hidden ballots.

 

https://streamable.com/rjlfi7

 

Edit alternate and expanded version, a bit easier to follow.

 

Edited December 3, 2020 by Dguy210

[datzenmike]

3 hours ago, Jesse C. said:

And these are the types we have to deal with....

 

 

 

 

 

Damn, now more cosmetician for the females.

 

lol Vancouver is the capital of BC???