Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • datzenmike

    6113

  • john510

    3012

  • paradime

    1827

  • a.d._510_n_ok

    1416

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

19 hours ago, wayno said:
 
 
 
What a stupid Dumbass sheeple.

Don't insult the person! That is a fine progressive American exercising his freedom of speech! A powerful statement that more would embrace if they were serious about change. This should become a facebook challenge or a Tiktok thing, prove your dedication to the cause!
"Accident" is fake news, to undermine and gaslight true commitment, don't believe the establishment, stand  up and ignite!

Edited by frankendat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
19 hours ago, angliagt said:

  We now have a new governor here in Virginia.She ran as a Moderate Democrat,

promising to make life more affordable for Virginians.Right after she got into office,

about 50 new bills were proposed,putting taxes on multiple things.

          I think that it's ironic that when she responded to Trump's "State of the Nation"

speech,she blasted him about raising the cost of living for Americans.

Moderate my ass. She is about to sign a gun ban on par with California. https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20261/SB749

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I detest revised history.

 

Here's another example to change what was. Trump is a racist mutherfucker.

 

 

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past" I suggest everyone read Orwell. 

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, a.d._510_n_ok said:

tune in, turn on, drop out - big brother

 

If you have about a week and would rather read about Laurel Canyon (beware the flashbacks) it can be very entertaining if you read Rolling Stone and considered yourself pretty cool and up on the latest goings-on in the late 60's & early 70's. 'Big John' Holmes' final crash-&-burn even gets a chapter. There are 22 chapters and chapter 10 dealing with the Rustic Canyon project is extremely interesting. Here's the story as Dave McGowan put it down. 

 

https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/inside-the-lc-the-strange-but-mostly-true-story-of-laurel-canyon-and-the-birth-of-the-hippie-generation-part-i/

 

If you wanna check out some of his other writings, and be forewarned; some of them are a bit out there, here's Ur link:

 

https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, datzenmike said:

I detest revised history.

 

Here's another example to change what was. Trump is a racist mutherfucker.

 

 

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past" I suggest everyone read Orwell. 

 

Racist? Disagree and racist is the go-to? 

Link to comment

Trump is trying to change the history of slavery saying basically it isn't as bad as portrayed by the Smithsonian. I say leave it alone warts and all. It's a slippery slope when you start revising history. The Smithsonian also had a section on impeached presidents and his ego didn't like that.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
18 hours ago, datzenmike said:

Trump is trying to change the history of slavery saying basically it isn't as bad as portrayed by the Smithsonian. I say leave it alone warts and all. It's a slippery slope when you start revising history. The Smithsonian also had a section on impeached presidents and his ego didn't like that.  

Matt Walsh (conservative) recently released a documentary of Dailywire (conservative) Now neither Walsh nor Dailywire claim complete alignment to either the Republicans or Trump (Dailywire has a strong Jewish contingent) BUT (and I have no direct evidence of this) common sense would favor viewing their material as slanted toward the right. I have direct evidence of the legacy media CNN, NBC etc news of slanting their material to the left. So, try to mix and balance.

Since by releasing a documentary that contradicts much of the history taught in United States School (Walsh references what I was taught) Walsh and Dailywire had to assume their account would be fact checked. To be prudent, if half of the statistics and information presented by Walsh is true and half of that was/is either omitted or slanted in textbooks that would mean 25% of the material regarding slavery is either omitted or skewed in the history of the United States e.g. The Smithsonian. 

Does accepting or acknowledging that position make one racist? I do not believe Trump is racist and his actions prove him not to be. Trump has demonstrated if it is too his benefit, he would love and group, hate any group, benefit any group, be prejudice against any group, fuck any group without regard to race, creed, color, sex, gender, and likely species. 

post script: DailyWire released the history of slavery on youtube, give it a watch. I don't know about Canada, but when I watched it, I didn't find "lies and omissions" as much as the tone of how I remember the instruction vs. the facts Walsh presented.

Link to comment
16 hours ago, Rustbin said:

I found this interesting.

 

 

I don't even need to watch it. I hate change. I hate change when it is bad because it is bad and I hate change when it is good, because I am sure it is going to turn bad (and I am usually right)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
17 hours ago, Rustbin said:

I found this interesting.

 

 

I watched it. I must really not want to finish my engine hoist, damn. Anyway, the difference between American "not embracing" the negatives of its history and Germany "embracing" the negatives of its history, is not an equal comparison. The Germans and the Jews could have worked out peaceful solutions, it would not have required a complete reformatting of either culture to exist. The American Indian culture demanded land and resources that made cohabitation with the Colonial immigrants impossible. Granted the Colonists were selfish religious zealots, but the American Indian way of life was doomed. Just as life in the Western United States and eventually all of the United States is doomed. But unlike the American Indian, being forced from your home or fighting and dying for your land in the face of overwhelming odds is no longer considered heroic or even tragic, it is status quo. 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, frankendat said:

I watched it. I must really not want to finish my engine hoist, damn. Anyway, the difference between American "not embracing" the negatives of its history and Germany "embracing" the negatives of its history, is not an equal comparison. The Germans and the Jews could have worked out peaceful solutions, it would not have required a complete reformatting of either culture to exist. The American Indian culture demanded land and resources that made cohabitation with the Colonial immigrants impossible. Granted the Colonists were selfish religious zealots, but the American Indian way of life was doomed. Just as life in the Western United States and eventually all of the United States is doomed. But unlike the American Indian, being forced from your home or fighting and dying for your land in the face of overwhelming odds is no longer considered heroic or even tragic, it is status quo. 

 

The Indians didn't start immigrating to the US until after the British started being shit to them. The Indigenous peoples welcomed trade and did fairly well with the French but the English colonies incited some wars, then started to try to kill them off. They created the narrative of the vanishing Indian to justify taking the land, you have it backwards. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, datzenmike said:

History is written by the victors.

Always has been. Complete civilization histories have been lost because the victor had no want to keep that information known. Doing so would have validated the loser. The only reason we know of some past civilizations is because of the monument/temples/etc. that were made and couldn't simply be wiped off the face of the earth, while other victors wove some of the culture into their own to absorb what they determined was worth keeping.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Rustbin said:

 

The Indians didn't start immigrating to the US until after the British started being shit to them. The Indigenous peoples welcomed trade and did fairly well with the French but the English colonies incited some wars, then started to try to kill them off. They created the narrative of the vanishing Indian to justify taking the land, you have it backwards. 

I did not know the "narrative of the vanishing Indian" and now that I know it, my position and history remain unchanged. Once again, some jackass trying to justify a grant, spent a Phd in mental masturbation and came up with horseshit. 

As is evident today, it wasn't a myth. Justification is a process by which liberals excuse actions they find bad, but in no way intend to stop. E.g. One tribe of 10,000 claimed, and defended by force against other tribes, a 20,000 acre chunk of land. Colonist immigrants, fleeing undesirable conditions in their home country, invaded America. They brought with them experience in town building, trade and science and learned how to adapt those methods to America from the Indians. The Colonist immigrants were greedy fucks and began to rape the land. They didn't think themselves bad, they were only partaking of the excess bounty in the new world. Colonist immigrants were accustomed and living in towns of many. At first, this was bad, but it didn't bother all the Indians and everyone tried to get along. But the immigrants kept coming, soon there was 50,000 colonists on the land needed to support the one tribe of 10,000. The Indians could no longer hunt and find the animals needed to feed the tribe through the winter, the Indians that farmed now had to defend their land against colonist thieves, opposing tribe thieves and all of natures attacks on crops. Indians didn't want to live in towns. Indians didn't want to split up the land with all the assholes. 
But like in the West and Idaho, today, the assholes keep coming. The Indian way of life was doomed. My way of life is doomed. Assholes have been coming to Idaho and raping the land since I have been born, the after I came to Idaho and there was another one. (Obviously, before, but I am talking about my experience with Colonist greedy fucks) and at first it didn't bother me and everyone tried to get along, but the area where I live had a population of 150,000 in 1990 and is estimated at over 1 million today.  I have been unable to hunt for the last few years. (most of Idaho is now on a lottery draw to get a tag to hunt) The greedy fucks want my land to build apartments are trying to force me out through high taxation and infill housing. It is either sell, or if you and your neighbors don't sell, then will flood your area with low income housing and then you won't be able to sell. Or your property taxes will be so high, that you can no longer afford the property tax payment, the City will foreclose on your house and sell it to the bank. 
Can't feed yourself by hunting, can't afford land to farm (as if a regular Joe, could imagine of being a farmer, HA) when Americans are "displaced", "forced from land or homes", it don't mean shit. I am jealous of the Indians. 
“To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods,
― Thomas Babington Macaulay

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.