konig209 Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 What is everyones thoughts on this? http://forums.nicoclub.com/epa-seeks-to-prohibit-conversion-of-vehicles-into-racecars-t606720.html Quote Link to comment
HRH Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Fucking EPA horseshit. Kill 'em all. That's what I think. The EPA is just trying a scare tactic there. If they want to tank the economy and tell everyone, oh no, you can't race cars because that's poor gas mileage and bad emissions, then they might as well say fuck the space program because that generates a ton of emissions more than racing every time they launch a shuttle or probe. 2 Quote Link to comment
konig209 Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Shits getting out of hand. 1 Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 First of all there is no link to anything so hearsay followed by kneejerk reaction. Second, BILLIONS are spent on the aftermarket car 'performance' industry. BILLIONS. They are not going to let this happen. What about all the taxes spent on this stuff? What about all the parts already out there?? It's like gun regulations... it simply ain't happening. Third I think it said proposal. There are probably tens of thousands of 'proposals' a year made. The vast majority are laughed away. Fourth, good luck with them defining what constitutes a 'Race Car'. Performance tires, lowering blocks, sway bars, 'racing' mirrors, spoilers, red paint and decals, hood scoop, hood pins, 'mag' rims, BRE stripes and loud exhaust???????.... on and on and on and on and on.... 3 Quote Link to comment
Rjawm Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 First of all there is no link to anything https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2060-AS16/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-fuel-efficiency-standards-for-medium-and-heavy-duty-engines-and-vehicle https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/09/08/2015-22028/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-fuel-efficiency-standards-for-medium--and-heavy-duty-engines-and http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2015/hd-trucks-phase-2-standards 1 Quote Link to comment
Mattndew76 Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 I'm knee jerking like a mofo now. I hope people do get a little bent about this and flood the representatives with hatreraid!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Epa=terrorist organization 1 Quote Link to comment
bananahamuck Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Did you read them? Those links have nothing to do with turning cars into race cars or whatever this thread is about,,, they are all in reference to mandating more fuel efficient / cleaner burning engines in heavy duty trucks,, ie diesel semi trucks... https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2060-AS16/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-fuel-efficiency-standards-for-medium-and-heavy-duty-engines-and-vehicle https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/09/08/2015-22028/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-fuel-efficiency-standards-for-medium--and-heavy-duty-engines-and http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2015/hd-trucks-phase-2-standards 2 Quote Link to comment
Burabuda Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f15900.pdf ^ the official doc if anybody wants to actually read it i just skimmed it butt didn't find anything about "retroactive" restrictions just a goal for 2018+ also, tried butt could not find this related to passenger cars. seemed to target heavy and interstate trucks 1 Quote Link to comment
konig209 Posted February 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 https://www.sema.org/news/2016/02/08/epa-seeks-to-prohibit-conversion-of-vehicles-into-racecars Quote Link to comment
Rjawm Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Did you read them? Those links have nothing to do with turning cars into race cars or whatever this thread is about,,, they are all in reference to mandating more fuel efficient / cleaner burning engines in heavy duty trucks,, ie diesel semi trucks... Yes, I did read them, and I posted them because I found it odd that there was nothing in them regarding the subject of the thread yet they are the direct result of using the title of origin in the OP's cited thread on NICO. It seemed like more fear mongering than fact at that point. SEMA is known to whip up frenzy when needed. But then again, it was on the internet so it must be true. Quote Link to comment
Rjawm Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 https://www.sema.org/news/2016/02/08/epa-seeks-to-prohibit-conversion-of-vehicles-into-racecars Look at that really closely, it's a SEMA press release posted on a SEMA page with a SEMA backed statement of protection. As Mike stated, there is no link or direct info in the memo that cites actual government intention to do what SEMA is claiming is going to happen. 1 Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Every couple of years some story comes up or a petition to sign about some law that is contrary to owning and operating a vintage car. Seems to me just to stir up people. These things have a life of their own, come up and then..... never mentioned ever again. Quote Link to comment
Burabuda Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 SEMEN is known to whip up frenzy when needed. 1 Quote Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 First of all there is no link to anything so hearsay followed by kneejerk reaction. Second, BILLIONS are spent on the aftermarket car 'performance' industry. BILLIONS. They are not going to let this happen. What about all the taxes spent on this stuff? What about all the parts already out there?? It's like gun regulations... it simply ain't happening. Third I think it said proposal. There are probably tens of thousands of 'proposals' a year made. The vast majority are laughed away. Fourth, good luck with them defining what constitutes a 'Race Car'. Performance tires, lowering blocks, sway bars, 'racing' mirrors, spoilers, red paint and decals, hood scoop, hood pins, 'mag' rims, BRE stripes and loud exhaust???????.... on and on and on and on and on.... Clearly you don't understand the power those mobsters from the EPA posses... Quote Link to comment
shacks510 Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Making batteries for hybrid/electric vehicles is an environmental disaster... yet those are allowed? No, only hydrocarbons emitted by vehicles are the topic of concern. Why don't we start inhabiting another planet so we can pollute there too? 1 Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted February 9, 2016 Report Share Posted February 9, 2016 Worst thing they are doing is basically outlawing the processes that aloe us to manufacture things. 1 Quote Link to comment
Mattndew76 Posted February 10, 2016 Report Share Posted February 10, 2016 More info. http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/a19375/heres-what-the-epas-track-car-proposal-actually-means/ Quote Link to comment
Dime Dave Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 I tend not to believe much of what government spokesmen tell me when it come to regulations and their intended uses. I do feel it is important they know how large the automotive enthusiast group is in this country. SEMA started an online partition to speak out against what they perceived as a threat to automotive enthusiasts. It doesn’t matter which side of the story you believe, but signing the SEMA partition does do one thing. It makes the non-automotive bureaucrats aware of how large this enthusiast group is. Please take the effort to sign the SEMA partition, if not to support the issue but just to show these bureaucrats how many automotive enthusiast there are in this country. SEMA probably has the best funded lobbyists in Washington to support automobile hobbyists. As enthusiasts we should provide them with support to prove that automobile enthusiasts should be listened to. SEMA Partition Link - https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/tell-epa-withdraw-its-proposal-prohibit-conversion-vehicles-racecars-0 1 Quote Link to comment
Draker Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Within 10 days they met the goal for that petition by 150%. Quote Link to comment
Draker Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 aka 150k signatures. I believe the requirement is 100k for government review of some sort..? Quote Link to comment
Lockleaf Posted February 19, 2016 Report Share Posted February 19, 2016 Correct. At 100k, the petition has to be heard on the floor in Congress and be voted upon. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.