KoHeartsGPA Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 I think the chemicals holding his massive combover are causing serious problems. I do agree with many things he says, but damn it's not goimg to work out with this guy. It was the opposite with Obama, perfect, charismatic, smooth......look where THAT has us.... Quote Link to comment
Draker Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 This was on CNN. Probably looping throughout the day... what does Slash's shirt say? Quote Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 This was on CNN. Probably looping throughout the day... what does Slash's shirt say? I'm a Raiders fan? Quote Link to comment
VFR800 Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 It was the opposite with Obama, perfect, charismatic, smooth......look where THAT has us.... Sadly for USA,there's either one end of the spectrum to left or right you can choose OR. . . go with a Clinton or Bush V 2.0 and have pretty much most of the same that their previous namesakes did whilst in office. 1 Quote Link to comment
flatcat19 Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 I'm a Raiders fan? Slash is the guy on the right, noob. 3 Quote Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 That's how much I follow bands, gimme music, I don't care about your lives... 2 Quote Link to comment
Draker Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 You have to excuse my potato of a camera on my phone. 1 Quote Link to comment
bananahamuck Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 I blew that picture way the fuck up to read what was under the main word and there is no registered trademark after the R that all Fender shirts have ,,, sooooo it must be Fucker 1 Quote Link to comment
bananahamuck Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Fucker it must be Quote Link to comment
Draker Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 lol.. yeah, it said sexual something something below it. CNN is run by retards. I lol'd 3 Quote Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 :rofl: 2 Quote Link to comment
MicroMachinery Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Really? Thought you couldn't even pump up a tire. Definitely know how to check the oil, though. 1 Quote Link to comment
tr8er Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 So, what happens if you unscrew a tire stem cover when it's at the bottom of the wheel? I'm rolling the car so they point up figuring all the air will spill out if I don't. But I've always wondered... Quote Link to comment
uberkevin Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Massachusetts police seized more than $107,000 from a married couple who they suspected of a crime. But three years later, no charges have ever been filed and the couple has still not been returned their money, which they claim was earned legally. On October 25, 2012, Adam and Jennifer Perry were stopped for speeding in Henry County, MA, according to the Dispatch-Argus. Police searched the couple’s Toyota Tundra and found a suitcase containing $107,520 in cash. And although no drugs were found, the police suspected the Perrys of criminal activity, so they seized the cash and the Toyota Tundra. After hours of questioning, the Perrys insisted they did nothing wrong and were simply on their way to a doctor’s appointment in Salt Lake City, Utah. The money, they say, was from insurance settlements, vehicle sales, personal income, and other legal means. With no evidence of a crime, the police eventually let the Perry’s go. But a federal asset forfeiture program allowed the police to keep every dollar in the car, as well as the car, without even pressing charges. Three years later, the Perry’s are still fighting to get their property back. But a federal judge recently demanded that the couple prove how they got the money. However, Adam Perry argues that not only has he and his wife already provided an explanation, but they shouldn’t have to prove their innocence. Rather, the police and prosecutors need to prove guilt. On December 23, the Justice Department announced it will discontinue an asset forfeiture program that allows local police departments to seize property from suspects under federal law. The controversial “equitable sharing” program allowed local and state police departments to keep up too 80 percent of assets they seized, even if the suspects are never charged with a crime, according to the Washington Post. It’s not yet clear how this will impact the Perry’s case, which is still pending in federal court. Quote Link to comment
uberkevin Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Good'ol America. Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Air bubbles always rise to the top of a tire so your good. (gato around?) 1 Quote Link to comment
a.d._510_n_ok Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Massachusetts police seized more than $107,000 from a married couple who they suspected of a crime. But three years later, no charges have ever been filed and the couple has still not been returned their money, which they claim was earned legally. On October 25, 2012, Adam and Jennifer Perry were stopped for speeding in Henry County, MA, according to the Dispatch-Argus. Police searched the couple’s Toyota Tundra and found a suitcase containing $107,520 in cash. And although no drugs were found, the police suspected the Perrys of criminal activity, so they seized the cash and the Toyota Tundra. After hours of questioning, the Perrys insisted they did nothing wrong and were simply on their way to a doctor’s appointment in Salt Lake City, Utah. The money, they say, was from insurance settlements, vehicle sales, personal income, and other legal means. With no evidence of a crime, the police eventually let the Perry’s go. But a federal asset forfeiture program allowed the police to keep every dollar in the car, as well as the car, without even pressing charges. Three years later, the Perry’s are still fighting to get their property back. But a federal judge recently demanded that the couple prove how they got the money. However, Adam Perry argues that not only has he and his wife already provided an explanation, but they shouldn’t have to prove their innocence. Rather, the police and prosecutors need to prove guilt. On December 23, the Justice Department announced it will discontinue an asset forfeiture program that allows local police departments to seize property from suspects under federal law. The controversial “equitable sharing” program allowed local and state police departments to keep up too 80 percent of assets they seized, even if the suspects are never charged with a crime, according to the Washington Post. It’s not yet clear how this will impact the Perry’s case, which is still pending in federal court. cops would tell you that didn't seize the money but rather "arrested" it. the concept stems from RICO anti-racketeering statutes concocted under Nixon to fight mobsters in the early 1970s that were eventually used on the average American after the politicians swore they would never be. 1 Quote Link to comment
KoHeartsGPA Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 The IRS has big claws too, they can take your shit at will with no justification, that's why you never deposit sums over $10k at the banks, mericans are blind. Quote Link to comment
q-tip Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 Air bubbles always rise to the top of a tire so your good. (gato around?) He is pretty round. 1 Quote Link to comment
Chuck Most Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 I think the chemicals holding his massive combover are causing serious problems. I do agree with many things he says, but damn it's not goimg to work out with this guy. I'm just waiting for him to pull out of the race, and then announce to the press "I did it for the lulz". 1 Quote Link to comment
Busta Nut Posted December 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.