Jump to content

510 Wagon Rear Lowering Kit


Dzaster

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When I originally searched and found this setup it was on Kelvin Dietz wagon (Click). I got in touch with him and he, at the time, was willing to sell me what he felt was his last kit. He quoted me and said he would look for the parts. I hadn't heard for a long while so I began putting together the parts to make my own kit.

 

Last he emailed me last week, he said he had found the parts and was seeing if I still needed the kit/parts. I declined and thanked him for his time, willingness and help.

 

After starting on my kit I think I would have loved to have been given the parts to just weld together instead of the mocking up, cutting, and grinding that I'm having to do. Plus it doesn't help that I don't have a lot of choices for hardware/material and limited by tools.

 

I wasted a few hours trying to get to this point (see pics below) because welding two nuts together to get one long one just isn't easy, as once you weld, it will offset the nuts ever so slightly that it binds. I finally got it, but its still a little tough getting it to thread. No matter, I don't plan to adjust much/if at all--after the initial adjust that is.

 

Anyways, perhaps if someone really wants they can try and get in touch with Kelvin Dietz and see if he wants to sale what he has. His kits still requires welding.

 

20130330_110257_zpsb489e76b.jpg

20130330_140632_zps6941f2f9.jpg

 

 

Please don't mind the sloppy welds. Being flux core with no gas, doesn't help my cause. lol

 

 

 

 

Question for Joel, I'm assuming the bars are adjusted, preloading the axle. Anyways you can suggest by how much to preload them?

Link to comment

I would love to make these for you guys and had planned to potentially market these after confirming the design on my car but during the design and construction phase, I realized that this wasn't going to be a "universal kit". The problem is that the bar length, tab locations and angles will change based on ride height and lowering method (de arched springs, blocks only, both... etc.) That said, I can make a kit that will fit but it won't be optimized the same if I built it with your car right in front of me. Also, these kits won't be cheap because of the cost of materials and the labor and time involved. After nailing down the particulars, I may be able to reduce costs but for now these are one off pieces and come with a custom price. If your serious about wanting a set, pm me and I'll see what I can do about putting together a price.

 

Joel

Link to comment

I design for ground clearance more than anything. Make the bars as long as possible too increase leverage and yes, as parallel to the body as you can make them ( this kinda works itself out) I don't pre load my bars... instead I set them up neutral as the swing angle of the suspension movement maintains a constant bar length (i.e. no suspension bind during articulation) with my current geometry figures.

 

Joel

Link to comment

still every driveway u pull in it will drag .......it wont take much of  incline of a driveway to make those dig in

 

 

and i thought cal trac made there's with a slip yoke to compensate for binding...edit...nope ... one of the manufacturers did...

Link to comment

still every driveway u pull in it will drag .......it wont take much of incline of a driveway to make those dig in

 

and i thought cal trac made there's with a slip yoke to compensate for binding...edit...nope ... one of the manufacturers did...

What your referring to is a slip twist joint. What we need to realize is that there are two very different traction bar designs that we're talking about here.The first is a ladder bar which mounts at two points diff side ( one above and one below the pinion) and a single mount at the frame. This configuration will create a force vertical or perpendicular to the frame so a slip twist joint will bind while it's required to dampen axle wrap, but slip and twist inside itself during general suspension movement.

A single traction bar mounted under the leaf springs like I've designed creates a forward force or parallel to the frame. In this case, a slip twist joint would only telescope under axle wrap situations, nullifying the benefits of even having a traction bar. I've noticed a couple designs being utilized where this was an issue.

Also, I've oriented my mounts in such a way that the length between the two mounting points at the track bar doesn't change during suspension movement. This means that the bar is the same length at ride height, full compression and full droop... it will only bind when the axle tries to wrap during acceleration (like it should) but not during regular driving.

And like I said, I've never had a problem dragging the stock mounts so I suspect I will have even better luck with this setup ;) oh and this setup isn't new to me... I've already got a couple thousand miles on it.

 

Joel

Link to comment

Thats what i thought too, that is was hanging down lower.

 

However, you've eliminated a bit of the excess--which was insulation--to move the front of the leaves up closer to the undercarriage.

correct, that and the tire is so close to the front leaf mount that you would have drive over a curb or ledge to make contact. now if the mount we're three foot in front of the tire...

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.