72240z Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 This thing is pretty damn crisp. My friend turned me on to it tonight. What wont they put zg's on? haha Look how much carb in on that A12. Look how close the tolerance is too, suckin the pain off that firewall. Quote Link to comment
Duke Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 RWD stagger on a FWD car is sooo lame IMO. The body shape is pretty cool on these though. Quote Link to comment
Pumpkn210 Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 #1 RWD swap car in World! So freakin HOT, but looses too many points bein Wrong Wheel Drive! Anybody know what year it is? Quote Link to comment
72240z Posted February 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 RWD stagger on a FWD car is sooo lame IMO. The body shape is pretty cool on these though. How is it a rwd stagger? :confused: Looks like fwd stagger to me. The rear wheels pop out a lil more because of the offset (I believe same front and rear) but the front wheels are definitely larger I agree though I don't like rwd stagger on a fwd car, VW owners love to do that. #1 RWD swap car in World! So freakin HOT, but looses too many points bein Wrong Wheel Drive! Anybody know what year it is? I said the same thing to me friend lol. would never cut one that nice but think a rwd cherry would be..... right? haha It's one of Flyrats cars but they don't give a year. Quote Link to comment
Duke Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 I just looks to me like the rear wheels have a little more "poke" than the fronts do. I'm guessing same size tires front and rear with wider wheels in the rear. It could all just be in my imagination though. Quote Link to comment
fisch Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Indeed! Cool little car. I'd dig a Flyrat sticker for my window! Quote Link to comment
72240z Posted February 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 I just looks to me like the rear wheels have a little more "poke" than the fronts do. I'm guessing same size tires front and rear with wider wheels in the rear. It could all just be in my imagination though. No, I agree they do stick out more but because of offset not size. I thought staggering was size? Look at the back to front close up, they used much bigger tires in the front then rear. Thought they were rocking the under size rear for style at 1st because Japanese people love that bit but now I'm thinking it was to offset the offset lol making the rears pop out. I could be wrong I didn't build that car lol. The front tires looks much bigger to me though, wheels and offsets look the same. Thought the fronts were larger in diameter for a second too but I think it's like an optical illusion. :huh: Quote Link to comment
bonvo Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 to bad we never got the e10 stateside Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Looks good commin' ... not so good goin' Round tail lights just don't work. Too early 60's. 240Z car tail lights would be better. . Quote Link to comment
72240z Posted February 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Ya agree the round is not the best option. The car looks like a combo of like 5 datsun imho, so something seem like they just don't fit 100%. Idk if I agree about all round lights being bad though or 60's. The Ken&Mary tails and round and hot. Think they would even work on the Cherry actually. Quote Link to comment
datzenmike Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Idk if I agree about all round lights being bad though or 60's. Nah, didn't say they were bad like 60's just round like used in the 60's. It just doesn't 'fit' the design somehow. But, hey that's just me, and only an opinion, like Radio's truck rims. :lol: Then there's the hideous that's so, so bad it's chic. Like the Pacer. Quote Link to comment
72240z Posted February 5, 2010 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Oh I misunderstood, sorry. I think even the ones on there wouldn't look so bad if they weren't so far out to the edges with square lights crammed in on the inside. Still prob not too good though lol. It almost looks like they rushed to do it last min. Quote Link to comment
Guest kamakazi620 Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 Nah, didn't say they were bad like 60's just round like used in the 60's. It just doesn't 'fit' the design somehow. But, hey that's just me, and only an opinion, like Radio's truck rims. :lol: Then there's the hideous that's so, so bad it's chic. Like the Pacer. About time someone said sumthin' bout his RIMS!!! i just about puked when i saw those!!!! whats next Fart can?? wing on tailgate? :lol: :lol: 2 Quote Link to comment
Guest kamakazi620 Posted February 12, 2010 Report Share Posted February 12, 2010 These guys made the pacer COOL!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
mikko1200 Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 #1 RWD swap car in World! So freakin HOT, but looses too many points bein Wrong Wheel Drive! Anybody know what year it is? The most probably 1973, could be 1974 too. Last summer I saw two rallycross E10 sedans which were converted to RWD with Volvo engine. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.